Conservatives open up a 19-point lead over the Liberals.

From February 1 to 7, 2024, Abacus Data conducted a national survey of 2,398 adults exploring several topics related to Canadian politics and current events as part of our regular national omnibus surveys.

Conservatives lead by 19 over the Liberals, tied for the largest national lead we’ve ever measured for the Conservatives.

If an election were held today, 43% of committed voters would vote Conservatives with the Liberals at 24%, the NDP at 18% and the Greens at 4%. The BQ is at 34% in Quebec.

Since our last survey, the Conservatives are up 3, the Liberals down 1, the NDP down 2 and the Greens down 1.

Regionally, the Conservatives are well ahead in the Prairies, lead by 22 in BC, and 14 in Ontario. In Atlantic Canada, the Conservatives are 16-points ahead of the Liberals while in Quebec, the BQ leads by 8 over the Conservatives who are statistically tied with the Liberals.

If we isolate British Columbia, Ontario, and Atlantic Canada only, we find the Conservatives up 2 and the Liberals unchanged from our last survey in January across these three regions/provinces.

Demographically, the Conservatives lead among all age groups with the Liberal vote share correlated with age. The Liberal vote share rises as the age of the respondent increases. The opposite is true for the NDP. For a deeper analysis of how younger Canadians have soured on the Liberals, check out my Substack.

Men are 9-points more likely to vote Conservative than women and 5-points and 9-points less likely to vote Liberal and NDP respectively.

When we ask people if they would consider voting for each of the main political parties, 54% say they are open to voting Conservative (up 3 since last month) while, 41% are open to voting NDP (down 2), and 40% are open to voting Liberal (down 2) and the lowest we have measured for the Liberals since they were elected in 2015.

We continue to measure voter motivation by political party.

We find that Conservative supporters are more likely to say they would vote than Liberal or NDP supporters. The enthusisiam gap has closed a bit between Conservative and Liberal voters – down 3 to 10 this wave.

What else are Canadians thinking?

The mood of the country remains decidedly negative. Today, only 1 in 4 think Canada is headed in the right direction and only 17% feel optimistic about the direction of the country. This mood continues to be very sour.

The federal government’s approval rating is down 4-points from last month to 24%, the lowest we have measured since the Liberals were elected in 2015. 59% disapprove of the job performance of the federal govenrment led by Justin Trudeau.

Impressions of Justin Trudeau are unchanged. 57% have a negative impression of the Prime Minister and 24% have a positive view for a net score of -33.

In contrast, impressions of Pierre Poilievre are also unchanged with 38% viewing him positively and 36% negatively for a net score of +2. Any attempts by the Liberals to weaken Poilievre have not had any impact as of yet.

Feelings about NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh are largely unchanged. Today 34% have a negative impression compared with 33% who have a positive one for a net score of –1.

Only 14% of Canadian adults believe Justin Trudeau and the Liberals deserve to be re-elected. That number has been flat and unchanged since September and is down 7 points from the first time we asked it at the end of June – the last poll before we saw a big shift in voter intentions towards the Conservatives.

Those who say it’s time for a change in government and feel there’s a good alternative to the Liberals is down slightly to 52% but the Conservatives have consolidate more of the change vote gaining 4 points among solid change voters and 4-points among those who want change but don’t feel there’s a good alternative.

It is worth noting that Quebec stands out from the rest of the province when it comes to their views on change and the alternatives.

Outside of Quebec, 56% of Canadians think it’s time for a change and there is a good alternative to the Liberals. In Quebec, that number is only 38%.

In contrast, 45% of Quebecers say it’s time for a change but there isn’t a good alternative to the Liberals, 15-points higher than in the rest of the country. Among this almost half of the Quebec electorate, the BQ gets 49% of the vote to 27% for the Liberals and 12% for the Conservatives. If the Conservatives are going to make more gains in Quebec, they will need to convince this group – who want change – that they are a safe and acceptable option.

What Canadians feel are the top issues facing the country are fairly stable althoughhousing affordability is down 5-points and now tied with healthcare as the second most salient issue. The economy is up 3 while crime and public safety is up 2 (likely due to the focus on auto theft).

In this survey we asked Canadians to what extent different words or phrases describe the current Liberal government led by Justin Trudeau. My goal was to understand whether there is any variation in how people see the government. Overall, the results are not very positive.

But when we drill down and look at the 250 respondents in our survey who say they voted Liberal in 2021 but today are either undecided or voting for another party (Liberal switchers), the story becomes a bit more clear. Clear majorities, and at times large majorities, don’t feel that any of the positive descriptions apply to the Liberal government. For example, 69% think that “transparent and accountable” describes the Trudeau government “not at all” or a “a little”. 64% don’t think it’s focused on the right priorities and 67% don’t think it listens to Canadians. These are people who voted Liberal last time but now say the government is not connecting, listening, and focusing on what matters.

To underscore just how important these feelings are to the Liberal Party’s electorate fortunes, the table below reports the Liberal Party vote share based on how people respond to the question. As is clear, there’s a strong correlation between these variables and there’s almost no difference regardless of the attribute we test.

The Upshot

According to Abacus Data CEO David Coletto: “The political environment continues to be deeply troubling for the Liberals. An historically low approval rating along with an electorate who few see good things in the federal government has led to a 19-point Conservative lead.

As I’ve noted before, we are not experience a period of Poilievre-mania. The Conservative lead – built from those who haven’t voted Conservative in the past two elections – is more about a rejection of the Liberals than an embrace of the Conservatives. That still remains a liability for the Conservatives.

But as long as people remain fatigued with Trudeau and unhappy with how the federal government is handling the key issues they care about, the Liberals will fail to rebuild their past coalition.”

Looking to conduct polling or market research in 2024? Have budget left to spend before the end of March? Send Yvonne an email to connect with the Abacus Data team today!

Methodology

The survey was conducted with 2,398 Canadian adults from February 1 to 7, 2024. A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.00%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

This survey was paid for by Abacus Data Inc.

Abacus Data follows the CRIC Public Opinion Research Standards and Disclosure Requirements that can be found here:  https://canadianresearchinsightscouncil.ca/standards/

ABOUT ABACUS DATA

We are the only research and strategy firm that helps organizations respond to the disruptive risks and opportunities in a world where demographics and technology are changing more quickly than ever.

We are an innovative, fast-growing public opinion and marketing research consultancy. We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail, and exceptional value.

We were one of the most accurate pollsters conducting research during the 2021 Canadian election following up on our outstanding record in 2019.

Contact us with any questions.

Find out more about how we can help your organization by downloading our corporate profile and service offering.

Is Canada’s consensus on immigration fracturing?

Amidst a housing crisis and a health care system buckling under the weight of demand, a growing number of Canadians appear to be pointing the finger at policies that allowed for a surge in unplanned growth.

Abacus Data CEO joins Althia Raj on her weekly podcast.

Love and Relationships in 2024: Canadians and Valentine’s Day

It is already February 2024 and Valentine’s Day is right around the corner. As we do with many holidays, we fielded some questions on our latest omnibus survey about Valentine’s Day, with a focus on holiday plans and preferred love languages.

The data below is from a survey fielded from January 18th to 23rd 2024. The survey was paid for by Abacus Data.

Two-thirds of Canadian couples are celebrating Valentine’s Day this year, up five points from last year. Younger Canadians are far more likely to be celebrating the holidays this year, as are higher-income households. Celebrations look similar across party lines.

In other years we have asked Canadians about their Valentine’s Day plans, and relationship expectations. This year we were curious how Canadians feel about receiving love.

By a landslide, Canadians’ most preferred love language is spending time with their partner (48% say this is their top choice). This is followed by physical touch (20%), kind words (14%), acts of service (13%) and receiving gifts (5%).

Younger Canadians have a greater affinity for gifts than most, but it is still their least favourite way to receive love.

As may be expected, the differences are greatest between men and women. Men are more likely to prefer physical touch, while women are more likely to prefer kind words and acts of service.

Upshot

Despite cost of living concerns it seems that Canadians are making investments in their relationships and celebrating love. If you are still looking for ways to celebrate love with your partner this year, perhaps plan to spend some time together. Statistically speaking, that’s the best way to show them you care.

Methodology

The survey was conducted with 2,199 Canadian adults from January 18 to 23, 2024. A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.09%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

This survey was paid for by Abacus Data Inc.

Abacus Data follows the CRIC Public Opinion Research Standards and Disclosure Requirements that can be found here: https://canadianresearchinsightscouncil.ca/standards/

About Abacus Data

We are the only research and strategy firm that helps organizations respond to the disruptive risks and opportunities in a world where demographics and technology are changing more quickly than ever.

We are an innovative, fast-growing public opinion and marketing research consultancy. We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail, and exceptional value.

We were one of the most accurate pollsters conducting research during the 2021 Canadian election following up on our outstanding record in 2019.

Contact us with any questions.

Find out more about how we can help your organization by downloading our corporate profile and service offering.

2024 Travel Snapshot: Canadians on the Move

Between January 4 and 9, 2024, Abacus Data conducted a nationwide survey with 1,500 Canadians aged 18 and above to assess travel intentions for 2024. The survey delved into multiple facets of travel, encompassing motivations, interests, and potential barriers, providing a comprehensive overview of the factors shaping Canadians’ travel decisions in the coming year.

Intentions to Travel in 2024

Half of Canadians (50%) note that they intend to travel in 2024. Among them, 11% have already booked their travel, with an additional 41% who express intentions to book in the near future. These results create a promising outlook for continued growth in the travel industry in 2024.

Notably, 71% of Canadians who intend to travel in 2024 have the intention to engage in domestic travel. Among them, 21% are considering a staycation within their region, 44% plan to explore within their province, and 45% have aspirations for travel within Canada but outside their province. Outside of domestic travel, 57% of Canadians who intend to travel in 2024 express an interest in international exploration. Among them, 31% are considering the United States, and 40% indicate a desire to travel beyond North America.

Motivations for Leisure Travel in 2024

Many Canadians planning to travel in 2024 have relaxation (47%) and visiting family and friends (45%) as their primary motivations. Furthermore, exploring nature (37%) and engaging in cultural exploration (31%) are additional factors driving leisure trips in 2024.

Analyzing the preferred destinations, the data indicates that individuals seeking relaxation (56%), cultural exploration (42%), and culinary experiences (33%) are notably more inclined to travel outside of Canada and the United States for these pursuits. Conversely, those with plans to travel within Canada are significantly more likely to do so for visiting family and friends (49%) and participating in adventure travel (15%) compared to other destinations.

Travel Budget and Barriers

Despite the existing hurdles posed by inflation and the rising cost of living across the country, a considerable number of Canadians intending to travel in 2024 note that they will maintain or increase their travel budget compared to 2023. Specifically, 38% plan to spend more on travel in 2024, while 39% aim to maintain the same spending level as in the previous year.

In crafting their travel budget for 2024, a substantial 75% of Canadians reveal their intention to adjust their budget to allow for travel and tourism opportunities. Among these individuals, 49% plan to cut down on various expenses, such as dining out, entertainment, and non-essential purchases, while 34% intend to reallocate parts of their budget specifically for travel. Results to reveal demographic differences, with younger Canadians, particularly those aged 18 to 29 (55%) and 30 to 44 (42%), being significantly more likely to take on side hustles or part-time work to save for travel. Additionally, older Canadians, notably those aged 60 and above, are more likely to not have to make budget adjustments to accommodate their travel plans (48%).

Examining potential barriers to travel in 2024, Canadians primarily cite financial concerns. The key factors impacting travel plans include the current cost of living (66%), transportation expenses (59%), the low value of the Canadian dollar (53%), and a loss of personal income (47%). These findings highlight the significant influence of economic factors on Canadians’ decision-making regarding travel in the upcoming year.

The Upshot

Despite facing economic challenges, encompassing concerns about the cost of living, transportation expenses, the weakened Canadian dollar, and potential income loss, many Canadians are planning to travel in 2024. Notably, half of Canadians express a desire to travel in the coming year, with almost three-quarters opting for domestic destinations. The primary motivations for travel are varied, including relaxation, visiting family and friends, exploring nature, and cultural exploration. These results present a significant opportunity for Canadian tour operators and DMOs to showcase the country’s attractions and draw travelers to their destinations that align with their primary motivations for travel.

Methodology

The survey was conducted with 1,500 Canadian adults from January 4 to 9, 2024. A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.53%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region.

This survey was paid for by Abacus Data Inc.

Abacus Data follows the CRIC Public Opinion Research Standards and Disclosure Requirements that can be found here: https://canadianresearchinsightscouncil.ca/standards/

About Abacus Data

We are the only research and strategy firm that helps organizations respond to the disruptive risks and opportunities in a world where demographics and technology are changing more quickly than ever.

We are an innovative, fast-growing public opinion and marketing research consultancy. We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail, and exceptional value.

We were one of the most accurate pollsters conducting research during the 2021 Canadian election following up on our outstanding record in 2019.

Contact us with any questions.

Find out more about how we can help your organization by downloading our corporate profile and service offering.

Reflections of a cycling tourist on the opportunities for Canadian destinations to welcome the millions who travel for cycling.

As most followers of Abacus Data know, I’m an avid traveler and a dedicated road cyclist. I’ve always believed that cycling is not just a sport or a pastime, but a unique way to experience the world. It offers an intimacy with the landscapes and cultures unlike any other mode of travel.

At Abacus Data, a leading Canadian market research and public opinion firm, we recently conducted a study that delves into the growing trend of cycling tourism in Canada, revealing insights that could shape the future of travel and tourism.

The Joy of Cycling Travel

Traveling with a road bike is a love affair with freedom and exploration. Cycling allows you to see more of a place, its nooks and crannies, the hidden gems that remain unseen from the windows of a car or a tour bus. It’s about feeling the terrain change beneath your wheels, from the smooth asphalt of urban landscapes to the rugged trails of rural backroads. This kind of travel keeps you fit, making every indulgent meal a guilt-free pleasure. After a day of pedaling, there’s nothing quite like the satisfaction of a hearty meal and a glass of fine wine.

I’ve been so lucky to take my bike to some of the most beautiful and bike friendly places in the world.

My favourite destinations exemplify this blend of physical challenge and sensory reward.

Mallorca is a cyclist’s dream with its friendly drivers, perfect roads, and diverse scenery. It’s a place where every turn offers a new vista and every small town invites you with a warm café con leche.

Riding this December around Tenerife, the largest of the Canary Islands

Maui, a Hawaiian Island, with its dramatic coastlines and the awe-inspiring ascent of a volcano, provides a ride that feels like a scene from a movie.

And Gatineau Park, my local haven, offers peaceful, car-free rides amidst breathtaking scenery and wildlife just minutes from downtown Ottawa, making the Nation’s Capital an ideal destination for cyclists.

Insights from the Abacus Data’s Market Research

Our recent survey at Abacus Data sheds light on the state of cycling tourism in Canada.

Approximately 2.5 million Canadians, or 8% of the adult population, have gone on a cycling vacation in the past two years, choosing destinations specifically for their cycling appeal. Notably, this trend is more prevalent among Quebecers (11%) and significantly less so in the Prairies (5%). It’s intriguing to see that younger adults, aged 18 to 29, are more likely to embark on such trips (17%) compared to only 2% of those over 60.

Looking forward, the future seems bright. About 11% of Canadians are planning a cycling-focused vacation in the next two years, with an additional 19% considering it. These statistics not only highlight a growing interest in cycling tourism but also point to a significant market opportunity for destinations across Canada.

The Potential for Destinations, Municipalities, and Communities

The economic impact of cycling tourism can be substantial. Taking Mallorca as a benchmark, which attracts around 200,000 cyclo-tourists annually, generating approximately €300 million (roughly 430 million Canadian dollars), the potential for Canadian communities is there. To become cycling tourism-friendly, destinations must focus on several key aspects:

  • Infrastructure: Good roads with safe, wide shoulders are essential. Cyclists prioritize safety and comfort when choosing their routes. For example, the area around Collingwood, Ontario would be so great for cycling if more of its roads had shoulders.
  • Accommodations: Availability of short-term rentals or hotels that cater to cyclists, offering secure bike storage and maintenance facilities. Cyclists need space to store their bikes. Often they want kitchens to prep meals and a hot tub or spa is an added benefit to relax those sore legs.
  • Community Accessibility: Destinations should have communities close enough to each other, allowing cyclists to easily find places to rest, eat, and explore.

Cycling tourists contribute significantly to local economies. They tend to spend more on accommodations, food, and local experiences. Municipalities, policymakers, and tourism operators can attract more cycling tourists by improving infrastructure, creating bike-friendly policies, and promoting their destinations as cycling hubs.

As a devoted cycling tourist, I can attest that destinations with these qualities not only attract more visitors but also enhance the quality of life for local residents. They foster a culture of fitness, environmental awareness, and community engagement. They also provide a significant source of income to cafes, restaurants, bike shops, retailers, and hotels in the area.

Implications

The increasing interest in cycling vacations is more than a trend; it’s a shift in how people want to experience the world driven by generational change.

As Canadians, we have a unique opportunity to embrace this shift, enhancing our infrastructure and services to welcome cycling tourists. By doing so, we not only diversify and strengthen our tourism industry but also contribute to the well-being of our communities and the environment. The journey ahead is promising, and as we pedal forward, let’s create paths that welcome both the wheels of visitors and the strides of progress.

When we ask people if they would consider voting for each of the main political parties, 5q% say they are open to voting Conservative (down 3 since mid-January) while, 43% are open to voting NDP, and 42% are open to voting Liberal (+1).

Methodology

The survey was conducted with 1,500 Canadian adults from January 5 to 9, 2024. A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.8%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

This survey was paid for by Abacus Data Inc.

Abacus Data follows the CRIC Public Opinion Research Standards and Disclosure Requirements that can be found here:  https://canadianresearchinsightscouncil.ca/standards/

ABOUT ABACUS DATA

We are the only research and strategy firm that helps organizations respond to the disruptive risks and opportunities in a world where demographics and technology are changing more quickly than ever.

We are an innovative, fast-growing public opinion and marketing research consultancy. We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail, and exceptional value.

We were one of the most accurate pollsters conducting research during the 2021 Canadian election following up on our outstanding record in 2019.

Contact us with any questions.

Find out more about how we can help your organization by downloading our corporate profile and service offering.

Understanding Canadian Perceptions of the Climate Action Incentive Payment and the Carbon Tax: An In-Depth Poll Analysis

In a recent Abacus Data survey, conducted from January 18 to 23, 2024, interviewing 2,199 Canadian adults, offers crucial insights into the public’s perception of the federal government’s national price on pollution, or carbon tax, and specifically the Climate Action Incentive Payment (CAIP). Results of this poll were reported in the Toronto Star yesterday and were asked on our regular national omnibus surveys.

Here are what I think the key takeaways are:

1. Limited Awareness and Belief in Receiving CAIP.

The survey reveals a significant gap in the awareness and belief among Canadians eligible for the CAIP. Only about half of eligible Canadians believe they received a payment. Among those who acknowledge receiving it, 86% associate it with the carbon tax. However, this still represents a minority of the eligible population. This gap highlights a major communication challenge for the federal government and advocates of carbon pricing. The lack of understanding about CAIP’s purpose exacerbates this issue, with only 48% correctly identifying its link to carbon pricing.

2. Carbon Pricing may be a Decisive Factor in the next Federal Election

The price on pollution or carbon tax, while not overwhelmingly unpopular, faces enough opposition to influence election outcomes significantly. Notably, 12% of 2021 Liberal voters not they won’t be voting Liberal partly or entirely because of the carbon tax. This sentiment is particularly pronounced in regions like Ontario and Atlantic Canada, presenting a tangible opportunity for the Conservatives to capitalize on this discontent and explains the double digit lead the Conservatives have build in those regions.

3. Challenges in Government Communications

The Liberal government’s 2016 rules on limiting government communications appear to have inadvertently restricted its ability to effectively convey policy rationales to the public. This is evident in the case of CAIP and pollution pricing. The reliance on earned media, which is becoming increasingly less effective, suggests a possible need to revisit these communication rules to enhance public understanding and support for government policies.

Now let’s dig into the survey results.

Detailed Insights from the Polling Data

1. Awareness and Belief in Receiving CAIP

The survey reveals that only about half of Canadians in eligible jurisdictions believe they received the CAIP payment. This figure points to a significant awareness gap, as the actual number of eligible recipients is much higher. This disparity suggests that the payment – which is designed to build support for the policy – is not being noticed by citizens.

Among the minority who recognize receiving the payment, 86% correctly link it to the carbon tax, indicating effective communication to a segment of the population but an overall failure to reach the broader eligible demographic.

2. Regional Variations in CAIP Awareness:

Regional differences in CAIP awareness are stark. Awareness is highest in Saskatchewan and Manitoba at 84%, while it drops to 64% in Atlantic Canada. This regional disparity in awareness and perceived eligibility could reflect differing regional media coverage, political discourse, and public engagement with provincial governments.

In populous provinces like Ontario, only half of the residents believe they are eligible for the payment.

3. Misunderstandings About CAIP’s Purpose:

When it comes to understanding CAIP’s purpose, the confusion is widespread. Less than half correctly identify its link to carbon pricing. A significant portion, 23%, erroneously believe it’s a payment to enhance home energy efficiency, while 15% associate it with general cost-of-living support. This confusion dilutes the policy’s perceived effectiveness and relevance, undermining its intended impact as a tool for climate action awareness (see more below on this).

4. Divided Opinion on Carbon Tax Policy:

Canadians are almost evenly split in their perception of the carbon tax, with a slight plurality(44%) viewing it negatively. This divide is not a vast chasm but indicates a significant challenge in garnering broader public support. Notably, the negative perception is more pronounced in strategically important regions like Ontario and Atlantic Canada, areas crucial for federal electoral success. For example, Atlantic Canadians are almost as likely as Albertans to believe the carbon tax is bad policy.

5. Perceptions vs. Reality of Carbon Tax Impacts:

The survey indicates a strong influence of misconception on public opinion. A significant 41% believe that the rebate does not compensate most people for the pollution prices they pay in energy costs (which is a main argument in favour of the policy design). Similarly, 43% doubt the policy’s efficacy in reducing emissions, and 47% attribute broad price increases to the carbon tax. These perceptions are not just knowledge gaps; they are potent narratives that have taken root in the public consciousness, likely fueled bythe political debate and what I believe is insufficient government communication.

And more striking, among those who think the carbon price is a bad policy are even more likely to hold the perceptions noted above. 1 in 3 don’t believe the price on pollution’s intent is to reduce emissions, 6 in 10 don’t believe most get what they pay back in a rebate, and 7 in 10 don’t think a carbon tax will significantly reduce emissions.

6. Financial Impact and Perception:

The belief about the financial impact of the carbon tax is a critical factor in public opinion. 43% of those eligible for CAIP think they would save money if the carbon tax were abolished, a perception more than twice as common as the belief that they would lose money. This sentiment is particularly strong among those who view the policy negatively, indicating a correlation between policy opposition and the perception of financial detriment.

7. Estimated Savings and Policy Opposition:

The estimated savings if the carbon tax were eliminated further underscores the financial concern driving opposition. Those against the policy estimate a higher personal financial impact, with an average perceived saving of $1,226, compared to those who support the policy. This disparity suggests that opposition to the carbon tax is partly rooted in a belief in its significant financial burden, whether accurate or not.

8. Political Implications and Voter Trends:

The political ramifications of these perceptions are profound. One in four Canadians, including a notable 10% of past Liberal voters, cite the carbon tax as a reason for withdrawing their support from the Liberals. This trend is more pronounced in regions like the Prairies and Atlantic Canada, indicating a regional dimension to the policy’s unpopularity that could reshape the federal political landscape.

The Upshot

The survey data underscores three critical points for professionals engaged in policy communications and advocacy:

  1. Enhancing CAIP Awareness: There is a pressing need to improve awareness and understanding of CAIP among Canadians. Effective communication strategies must be developed to bridge this knowledge gap.
  2. Addressing Carbon Tax Opposition: The carbon tax’s potential electoral impact necessitates a nuanced approach to address the concerns of those opposed while reinforcing the policy’s benefits.
  3. Revisiting Government Communication Strategies: The current limitations on government communications are proving counterproductive in explaining complex policies like CAIP and pollution pricing. A revision of these rules could be instrumental in fostering better public comprehension and support.

This research not only provides a snapshot of the current Canadian sentiment towards the carbon tax and CAIP but also highlights the intricate challenges and opportunities that lie ahead for policymakers, communicators, and advocates. Opponents are clearly winning the debate and public opinion on this issue could be decisive in the next election.

Good research like this can help guide policy communications, stakeholder engagement, and policy design.

Looking to conduct polling or market research in 2024? Have budget left to spend before the end of March? Send Yvonne an email to connect with the Abacus Data team today!

Methodology

The survey was conducted with 2,199 Canadian adults from January 18 to 23, 2024. A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.1%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

This survey was paid for by Abacus Data Inc.

Abacus Data follows the CRIC Public Opinion Research Standards and Disclosure Requirements that can be found here:  https://canadianresearchinsightscouncil.ca/standards/

ABOUT ABACUS DATA

We are the only research and strategy firm that helps organizations respond to the disruptive risks and opportunities in a world where demographics and technology are changing more quickly than ever.

We are an innovative, fast-growing public opinion and marketing research consultancy. We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail, and exceptional value.

We were one of the most accurate pollsters conducting research during the 2021 Canadian election following up on our outstanding record in 2019.

Contact us with any questions.

Find out more about how we can help your organization by downloading our corporate profile and service offering.

PCs lead by 11 over Ontario Liberals according to the latest Abacus Data poll.

Ontario’s political landscape, as of early 2024, presents an intriguing picture of continuity amidst subtle shifts. Yesterday, the Toronto Star reported on this poll that was shared exclusively with Robert Benzie.

The Progressive Conservative Party, led by Doug Ford, continues to hold the reins, but not without potential undercurrents of change. The Ontario Liberals and the New Democratic Party, in their pursuit of being the natural alternative to the PCS are carving distinct paths in this competitive space, influenced by regional allegiances and demographic divergences.

Key Findings

Electoral Prospects: The PCs, under Doug Ford’s leadership, would likely secure victory if a provincial election were held today, with 38% of the vote – a marginal decrease of 1% from December. The Ontario Liberals, now led by Bonnie Crombie, are second at 27% (unchanged from December), while the NDP, under Marit Stiles, trails closely at 23%. In short, stability.

Regional Dynamics: The PCs demonstrate a consistent lead across Ontario, though their margin narrows to 5 points in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area, excluding Metro Toronto.

Demographic Trends: There is significant gender gap in vote intentions, with the PCs commanding a 21-point lead among men, and a virtual tie with the Liberals and NDP among women voters. Age-wise, the PCs enjoy robust support among those aged 45 and above, whereas they are on par with the NDP among the younger electorate (under 45).

Approval Ratings: The Ford government’s approval rating stands at 29%, marking a nominal dip since December, while the disapproval rate remains static at 48%. Doug Ford’s personal favorability is net negative (-19), in contrast to the mildly positive scores of Bonnie Crombie (+3) and Marit Stiles (+4).

Accessible Voter Pool Parity: The accessible voter pools for the PCs, NDP, and Liberals are remarkably similar, with the PCs and NDP each appealing to 48% of voters, and the Liberals slightly behind at 47%.

Undecided Voters: A substantial 23% of respondents are undecided, a figure notably higher than the 15% national average in our recent Canadian politics survey. This includes 15% of 2022 PC voters, highlighting a potential vulnerability for Ford’s party.

The Upshot

According to Abacus Data CEO David Coletto: “The PCs under Doug Ford hold a strong position in Ontario’s political landscape though it is laden with subtle complexities. With the opposition divided almost equally between the Liberals and NDP, the PCs find an advantage in this split. Yet, the Ford government’s tepid approval rating along with a notable group of former PC supporters now in doubt, poses a challenge to their long-term stability along with several issues still confronting the government.

This changing story, characterized by a high rate of undecided voters and similar voter pools across parties, shapes an evolving and dynamic scene for Ontario politics as we move through 2024.”

Methodology

The survey was conducted with 955 eligible voters in Ontario adults from January 18 to 23, 2024. A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 3.1%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Ontario’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

This survey was paid for by Abacus Data Inc.

Abacus Data follows the CRIC Public Opinion Research Standards and Disclosure Requirements that can be found here:  https://canadianresearchinsightscouncil.ca/standards/

ABOUT ABACUS DATA

We are the only research and strategy firm that helps organizations respond to the disruptive risks and opportunities in a world where demographics and technology are changing more quickly than ever.

We are an innovative, fast-growing public opinion and marketing research consultancy. We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail, and exceptional value.

We were one of the most accurate pollsters conducting research during the 2021 Canadian election following up on our outstanding record in 2019.

Contact us with any questions.

Find out more about how we can help your organization by downloading our corporate profile and service offering.

What Poilievre’s shift from underdog to front-runner means for his strategy in 2024

In mid-December, Conservatives experienced a slight dip of five points in an Abacus Data poll while the Liberals were up four points. Despite the governing party’s excitement at the time, the poll nonetheless left the Conservatives still 10 points ahead of the Liberals.

While that poll might have been a statistical dip practically within the margin of error, it came at a time where Conservatives were under fire for voting against the bill updating the Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Agreement, ostensibly protesting its mention of carbon taxes, although the Liberals accused Conservatives of being soft on Russia. Meanwhile, Poilievre was threatening to keep Parliament sitting over Christmas and ruin the Liberals holidays for stymieing a carbon tax exemption for farmers, noted Abacus Data CEO David Coletto.

Can Donald Trump rescue Trudeau? – GZERO Media

By Stephen Maher

The struggling government of Justin Trudeau tried Tuesday to cast itself as the group to handle the vital relationship with the United States — announcing a “Team Canada engagement strategy” at the end of a cabinet retreat — but observers are dubious about the government’s ability to pivot its way out of trouble by invoking the specter of Donald Trump.

And Biden has better electoral prospects than Trudeau, according to pollster David Coletto, who concluded this week that Trudeau has little chance of winning another election. Trudeau seems out of touch with the top-of-mind concern of Canadian voters: the high cost of living. His firm, Abacus Data, recently found that the rising cost of fuel and food is the most important issue for three out of four Canadians — an unusually dominant concern.

Biden looks better

The bad news for Trudeau is that only one in four Canadians believe he “understands what life is like for people like you,” while two in four believe Poilievre does.

Inflation is brutal for incumbent governments — in the United Kingdom, United States and France the leaders are all facing stiff headwinds — but Coletto thinks Trudeau’s brand leaves him ill-suited to respond to a public dealing with scarcity.

Biden, on the other hand, could still pull off a win. “Biden is, I still think, better than 50-50. The odds are still in his favor, although not greatly. I think Trudeau has got a 10% chance of winning the next election.” Polling agrees. The horse race numbers for Trump-Biden show a tight race, while Trudeau has been far behind of his opponent for six months.

Conservatives lead by 15 over the Liberals. Poilievre leads Trudeau by 8, in head-to-head.

From January 18 to 23, 2024, Abacus Data conducted a national survey of 2,199 adults exploring several topics related to Canadian politics and current events as part of our regular national omnibus surveys.

Conservatives lead by 15 over the Liberals. NDP up to 20%.

If an election were held today, 40% of committed voters would vote Conservatives with the Liberals at 25%, the NDP at 20% and the Greens at 5%. The BQ is at 35% in Quebec.

Since our last survey, the Conservatives arre down 1, the Liberals up 1, the NDP up 2 and the Greens up 1.

Regionally, the Conservatives are well ahead in the Prairies, lead by 8 in BC, and 14 in Ontario. In Atlantic Canada, the Conservatives are 10-points ahead of the Liberals while in Quebec, the BQ leads by 5 over the Liberals with the Conservatives at 17%.

If we isolate British Columbia, Ontario, and Atlantic Canada only, we find the Conservatives up 1 and the Liberals unchanged from our last survey in January across these three regions/provinces.

Demographically, the Conservatives lead among all age groups with the Liberal vote share correlated with age. The Liberal vote share rises as the age of the respondent increases. The opposite is true for the NDP.

We find almost little difference in vote intention between men and women except for NDP support which is higher among women and Conservative support which is higher among men. This is the same pattern we measured earlier this month.

When we ask people if they would consider voting for each of the main political parties, 5q% say they are open to voting Conservative (down 3 since mid-January) while, 43% are open to voting NDP, and 42% are open to voting Liberal (+1).

We continue to measure voter motivation by political party.

We find that Conservative supporters are more likely to say they would vote than Liberal or NDP supporters. The 13-point difference between Conservative and Liberal enthusiasm higher than the 6-point gap we measured in the middle of January.

What else are Canadians thinking?

The mood of the country remains decidedly negative. Today, only 1 in 4 think Canada is headed in the right direction and only 15% feel optimistic about the direction of the country. This mood continues to be very sour.

The federal government’s approval rating largely unchanged with 28% approving (+2) and 58% disapproving.

Impressions of Justin Trudeau are unchanged as well. 57% have a negative impression of the Prime Minister and 26% have a positive view for a net score of -31.

In contrast, impressions of Pierre Poilievre have shifted somewhat with his negatives rising by 4-points to 36% while his positives hold fairly steady at 37% for a net score of +1.

Feelings about NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh are somewhat more negative than last wave. Today 36% have a negative impression compared with 34% who have a positive one for a net score of -2.

Only 15% of Canadian adults believe Justin Trudeau and the Liberals deserve to be re-elected. That number has been flat and unchanged since September and is down 6 points from the first time we asked it at the end of June – the last poll before we saw a big shift in voter intentions towards the Conservatives.

Those who say it’s time for a change in government and feel there’s a good alternative to the Liberals is up to it’s highest point in our tracking at 54%.

What Canadians feel are the top issues facing the country are fairly stable although we find immigration has become more salient over the past two weeks. Those putting immigration in their top issues is now 23% – tied with climate change- having risen 8 points over the past 4 months.

Finally, in this survey we asked Canadians if they only had a choice between Justin Trudeau and Pierre Poilievre, who would they prefer to be Prime Minister. Poilievre beats Trudeau by 8-points – 54% to 46%.

Of note:

  • 1 in 5 past Liberal supporters prefer Poilievre compared with only 6% of past Conservative supporters who prefer Trudeau.
  • 1 in 3 past NDP supporters prefer Poilievre compared with 2 in 3 who prefer Trudeau.
  • Poilievre is the preferred choice among all age groups, both men and women, and in all regions of the country except for Quebec.

The Upshot

According to Abacus Data CEO David Coletto: “Little has changed over the past two weeks and the opinion environment has been fairly stable for a few months now. The public wants change, is cranky and anxious, and is looking for an alternative to Mr. Trudeau and the Liberals. As I wrote earlier this week, I don’t believe Justin Trudeau can win in this environment and faces very long odds whenever the next election.

I argued that that the public mindset – one deeply concerned about scarcity and reinforced by a desire for change – is not going to accept more Trudeau.

We will have to see whether the attempt by the Liberals to link Poilievre and the Conservatives with Donald Trump will bare any fruit. Evidence from this survey suggests his negatives may be rising but we will need a few more waves to know for sure if the shift is real and sustained.”

Looking to conduct polling or market research in 2024? Have budget left to spend before the end of March? Send Yvonne an email to connect with the Abacus Data team today!

And don’t miss this new poll also out today: Do Canadians think Trump and Poilievre are similar? And if so, does it matter?

Methodology

The survey was conducted with 2,199 Canadian adults from January 18 to 23, 2024. A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.1%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

This survey was paid for by Abacus Data Inc.

Abacus Data follows the CRIC Public Opinion Research Standards and Disclosure Requirements that can be found here:  https://canadianresearchinsightscouncil.ca/standards/

ABOUT ABACUS DATA

We are the only research and strategy firm that helps organizations respond to the disruptive risks and opportunities in a world where demographics and technology are changing more quickly than ever.

We are an innovative, fast-growing public opinion and marketing research consultancy. We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail, and exceptional value.

We were one of the most accurate pollsters conducting research during the 2021 Canadian election following up on our outstanding record in 2019.

Contact us with any questions.

Find out more about how we can help your organization by downloading our corporate profile and service offering.