How Canadians view the federal party leaders

Our latest nationwide survey included a series of probes designed to help understand how the public sees the leaders of the three biggest national political parties.

Here’s what we found.

JAGMEET SINGH

Today, Mr. Singh is arguably the most popular national political leader, with 38% saying they have a positive view of him, while 26% have a negative view. His image is significantly better among women, younger voters, British Columbians and those with post-secondary education. His standing is noticeably worse than his national average in Quebec and Alberta. Those planning on voting Liberal, Green, and NDP like him, while Conservatives and Bloc voters mostly don’t.

Among those who definitely think it’s time for a change in government, more don’t like what they see in Mr. Singh than like him (positive 33% vs. negative 36%). Among voters on the centre, 32% are positive, while 24% are negative. He’s strong in urban Canada and weaker in rural Canada.

Among those who say they will definitely vote 41% like him, while 27% don’t.

ERIN O’TOOLE

Mr. O’Toole is the least popular of the national political leaders, with only 20% saying they have a positive view of him, and twice as many saying they have a negative view (40%).

His image is better among men than women, among those with less formal education, people living in Alberta, those in the 45-59 age group, but still is more negative than positive in every one of those cohorts. His best results are in Alberta and worst numbers are in Atlantic Canada, but the balance is negative in every region, including the Prairies. Those planning on voting Liberal, Green, NDP and BQ are pretty negative towards him.

Among those who definitely think it’s time for a change in government, 34% like him, while 29% don’t. Among voters on the centre, 17% are positive, while 32% are negative. His image is roughly the same in urban, suburban and rural Canada.

Among those who say they will definitely vote 23% like him, while 42% don’t.

JUSTIN TRUDEAU

Mr. Trudeau has an equal mix of fans (40%) and detractors (39%).

His image is doesn’t vary much by gender or age. His best results are in Quebec and worst numbers are in the Prairies. Everywhere but in the Prairies at least 40% like the Prime Minister. Those with high school education tend not to like Trudeau as much as those with a university education (35% vs. 46%). Those planning on voting Liberal like him, but supporters of all the other parties are more negative than positive towards him.

Among voters in the centre, 37% are positive, while 38% are negative. His image is better in urban and suburban areas than in rural Canada, but the differences are not that large.

Among those who say they will definitely vote 42% like him, while 40% don’t.

DETAILED IMPRESSIONS

We also asked respondents to assess each leader on several items – asking them which of two words or phrases best describes the leader. A large majority of voters see Jagmeet Singh as someone with good values, an optimist, and modern. Smaller majorities see him as interesting and possessed of great ideas. People are split about whether he gets “people like them”, although 70% of those under 30 think he does.

Most voters think Erin O’Toole does not get people like them, is boring, old-fashioned, and doesn’t have great ideas. People are split about whether he has good values and tend to see him as more of a pessimist than an optimist.

Justin Trudeau is seen by a broad majority as modern and an optimist, and a solid majority as having good values. Just over half see him as interesting, just under half say he has great ideas. A majority don’t think he really gets people like them.

Comparing the three leaders shows that Mr. Singh has a nine-point advantage on good values over Mr. Trudeau, who is 10 points ahead of Mr. O’Toole. Both Trudeau and Singh are widely seen as optimists and modern, but voters are not sure if Mr. O’Toole is an optimist and tend to think he is not very modern.

Trudeau and Singh are relatively competitive in terms of being interesting. Singh has a 10-point advantage on “great ideas”, “gets people like me”.

Mr. O’Toole’s biggest vulnerabilities are a sense that he doesn’t have very appealing ideas, doesn’t really get the majority of voters, and hasn’t seemed interesting thus far.

WHAT DO SWING VOTERS THINK?

If we concentrate our analysis on those who say they will definitely vote but haven’t yet made up their mind how they will vote, the data also show a modest advantage for Mr. Singh over Mr. Trudeau, both of whom are better positioned than Mr. O’Toole.

Mr. Trudeau’s biggest gaps relative to Mr. Singh are on “great ideas” and “gets people like me” where the NDP leader is ahead by at least 15 points.

Mr. O’Toole is competitive with Mr. Trudeau on “gets people like me” “great ideas” but neither scores very well with these voters. Mr. O’Toole’s biggest gaps behind Mr. Trudeau are on “modern”, “interesting” and “optimist”.

WHAT DO UNDER 30 WOMEN VOTERS THINK?

One of the more interesting voter segments we have been watching lately is women under the age of 30. Among these voters, Mr. Trudeau’s trails Mr. Singh by as many as 30 points on several of these traits.

The Conservative Party has often faced a challenge connecting with this demographic and these results suggest this remains the case.

UPSHOT

According to Bruce Anderson: “While overall voting intentions do not at this point signal a breakthrough for the NDP, these numbers suggest that one of the variables that can make a party more competitive – a popular leader – is something the NDP has right now.

For the Liberals, the data suggest some negatives have accumulated over the years Mr. Trudeau has been in power but there remains a reasonably robust amount of positive opinion towards the Prime Minister – and quite a bit more favourable impressions that those that exist for Conservative leader O’Toole.

For Mr. O’Toole, while impressions of leaders can change a lot during the course of the campaign, this would need to happen in order for the Conservatives to improve their competitiveness with the Liberals. In some respects, the numbers for Mr. O’Toole reflect a view of the party he leads more than he himself, but if his intention was to present himself as a different kind of Conservative leader, this project is not succeeding so far. With 3 out of 4 voters sensing that he does not get people like them – he has been failing to seem relevant and on point for a lot of people who might otherwise cast a ballot for change.”

According to David Coletto: “How we feel about a party’s leader is one of the most important factors in determining how we might vote. In 2011, Jack Layton convinced many of those who identified as Liberal to vote NDP thanks to their affinity for him and their dislike for Mr. Ignatieff. In 2015, Mr. Trudeau re-established Liberal support due to the optimism, change, and hope he offered and the excitement many voters had for what he stood for.

As we head towards a likely summer election call, our survey data suggest that Jagmeet Singh will start the campaign in a very strong position. He has a solid image built on a sense that he is modern, in touch with voters, and an optimist. His net favourables are the best of any federal leader at the moment.

Mr. O’Toole faces the opposite scenario. He has as many people who dislike him as Mr. Trudeau but half as many who like him. He’s seen as out of touch, old-fashioned, and lacking both charisma and good ideas. Both aren’t necessary to win but usually, a successful candidate has at least one to offer voters. Right now, most Canadians, including those who are on the fence but say they will vote, find few positive things to say about Mr. O’Toole.

Prime Minister Trudeau would start a 2021 campaign in a stronger position than in 2019. More people like him now than back then and the contrasts with Mr. O’Toole are even sharper than they were with Mr. Scheer. Although fewer people are angry and strongly dislike him, 2021 isn’t 2015 as Mr. Trudeau has few supporters with a deep affinity for him to count on. His road to re-election is built on general satisfaction with his performance and a dislike for his chief alternative, Mr. O’Toole.

Campaigns can change perceptions and impressions– especially coming out of a time when opposition leaders haven’t had much profile and voters haven’t really considered their political choices. But this data helps us understand where things stand just as the campaign is likely to start.”

METHODOLOGY

The survey was conducted with 1,500 Canadian adults from June 28 to 30, 2021. A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.6%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

ABOUT ABACUS DATA

We are the only research and strategy firm that helps organizations respond to the disruptive risks and opportunities in a world where demographics and technology are changing more quickly than ever.

Find out more about what we are doing to help clients respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

We are an innovative, fast-growing public opinion and marketing research consultancy. We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and exceptional value.

We were one of the most accurate pollsters conducting research during the 2019 Canadian Election.

Contact us with any questions.

Find out more about how we can help your organization by downloading our corporate profile and service offering.

Introducing Carson Miles – an Ottawa-based road cyclist being supported by Abacus Data

As many in our community know, I’m pretty passionate about cycling. I love all aspects of the sport – the way a ride makes me feel, the excitement of July when the Tour de France is on, or how a bike is a great equalizer.

Earlier this year, I was introduced to Carson Miles – a young, Ottawa-based cyclist – who happened to be the step-son of a client of mine.

After several conversations, a quick look at this Strava account, and a few encounters while riding in Gatineau Park, I soon realized Carson has so much potential and I wanted to support him.

I’m excited to announce that Abacus Data is supporting Carson for the 2021 season as he races in Europe and then in Canada later this year.

MEET CARSON MILES

My name’s Carson Miles, and I’m a cyclist racing for Tag Cycling, a Canadian trade team from Canada. I currently spend most of my time in Europe racing, and when I’m not overseas I’m based in Ottawa, Ontario. I’ve been cycling for around 7 years now competitively. Before cycling, I was playing high level basketball in Ottawa and competing nationally. I got into cycling through some family friends, and slowly fell more in love with the sport and started to take racing more seriously through my junior years. I quit basketball and spent more time away at training camps in Europe and the United States. During this time I also graduated from Woodroffe High School, where I did most of my grade 12 year online.

After high school, cycling became a full time pursuit for me. I had gone to worlds that year in Innsbruck, Austria, and I put going to post secondary on hold to follow my dreams. I later signed to a professional team, Floyd’s Pro Cycling, in my first year at the elite level. The year following I took another step forward and raced for the Israel Startup Nation development team, Israel Cycling Academy. In a year marred by Covid, my first experience racing in Europe was not an ideal one, but lots of lessons were learnt and experience gained. I did however have to take one step back and move to a smaller team where I am now. This just lit my fire even more to prove myself and show my capabilities to be worthy of a spot at the highest level. This year I will have the chance to do some big races in Europe with the National team and thanks to the support of Abacus Data, I can spend more time in Europe racing and training before my big goals this season.

For more information about Carson, visit his personal website.

Over the next few months, we will be cheering Carson on, sharing his experience racing and training in Europe, and following his progress.

For more information about Carson, check out this great profile of him from a few years back.

Good luck Carson racing this year!

David Coletto

2021 is not 2019: Liberals well ahead as Conservative vote hits a new low

We just completed a national survey of 1500 Canadian adults (June 10-15). Here’s what the survey found:

HOW BIG ARE THE PARTY VOTER POOLS?

If there is a national election in Canada this year, it may have a different flavour than recent elections.

The “accessible voter pool” (meaning the number of people who would consider voting for each party) has shifted. Today, the Conservatives (41%) sit behind both the Liberals (56%) and the NDP (48%). In Quebec, 51% are open to voting Liberal, 43% BQ, 31% NDP, and 25% Conservative.

For the Conservatives, this number is hazardously low and 7-points lower than at this point last year and are just 36% among those under 30, 37% among women, and less than 22% of current supporters of the Liberals, NDP, Green Party and Bloc. Only 39% of those who describe themselves as being on the centre of the spectrum say they would consider voting Conservative right now. No less worrying for Conservative campaign organizers may be the fact that 20% of those who consider themselves right of centre won’t consider voting for the CPC today.

For the Liberals, the 56% pool is some 6-points higher than it was in July 2019, before the last election. Less than 1 in 5 BQ voters (17%) and 22% of Conservative voters would consider voting Liberal, but 47% of Green Party and 49% of NDP voters would consider casting a ballot.

For the NDP, 48% indicates a higher degree of potential than we saw in the run up to the last election. A good deal of the potential lies in the fact that 66% of those under 30 will consider the NDP, a notch better than the Liberals at 62%) and almost 30 points ahead of the Conservatives (36%).

Among those who say they will definitely vote (which sometimes is a useful way to identify likely voters from those who may not turn out) 57% will consider the Liberals, 50% will consider the NDP and 42% will consider the Conservatives.

CURRENT VOTING INTENTION

If an election were held now, the Liberals would win 37% of the vote, the Conservatives 25%, the NDP 20%, the Green Party 7% and the BQ 29% in Quebec (8 points behind the Liberals).

• In BC we see the Liberals and NDP statistically tied (34% to 32%) with the Conservatives further back at 21%, and the Green Party polling at 7% .

• The Conservatives’ wide leads in the Prairies, are not as wide as they have been in the past. In Alberta, the Conservatives have 38% support, followed by the Liberals at 27% and the NDP at 20%. Another 15% of the voting intention is divided up among the Green Party (3%, the Peoples Party (8%) and another party (presumably the Maverick Party) with 4%.

• In Saskatchewan and Manitoba, we find the Conservatives with 38% support, the NDP at 27% and the Liberals with 26%.

• The Liberals (with 40%) have a 14-point lead over the Conservatives (26%) in Ontario, with the NDP at 22% and the Green Party at 8%.

• In Quebec, we see the Liberals with 37%, followed by the BQ (29%) the Conservatives (17%) the NDP at 10%.

• In the Atlantic provinces, the Liberals (53%) are well ahead of the Conservatives (20%) and the NDP (20%)

• Among the most likely voters (those who say they are certain to vote) the Liberals lead with 36% compared to 26% for the Conservatives, 20% for the NDP another signal of a Conservative “motivation” challenge, compared to past elections.

• Among self described “left of centre” voters, the Liberals (49%) lead the NDP (30%) and the Conservatives have 10% support.

• Among self described right of centre voters, the Conservatives have 64% support, followed by the Liberals (13%) the NDP (7%) the Peoples Party (6%) the BQ (6%) and Green Party (2%).

• Among those who say they are on the centre of the spectrum, the Liberals lead with 38% compared to 20% for the Conservatives, 18% for the NDP, and 9% for each of the Green and BQ parties.

This overall picture – today, with the caveat that elections can cause a lot to change – suggests the Liberals and the NDP are both better positioned than they were just before the 2019 election, and the Conservatives find themselves more weakly positioned due to a smaller accessible voter pool, only average motivation among Conservative voters (something they normally have an advantage on), and facing competition from both left and right, including in the Prairies, which has been a stronghold for the party in the past.

LEADER IMPRESSIONS

Justin Trudeau enjoys a positive impression among 40% and finds negative impressions among 39%, for a net score of +1. Trudeau is +6 in BC, +2 in Ontario, +12 in Quebec, and +9 in Atlantic Canada. He is -27 in Alberta and -19 in Sask/Man. Among those who will definitely vote, Trudeau is 0. Among those who say it would be “good to have a change of government but they don’t feel that strongly about it”, Trudeau is +20.

Jagmeet Singh enjoys a positive impression among 38% and finds negative impressions among 25% for a net +12. Singh is +24 in BC, +3 in Alberta, +15 in Man/Sask, +17 in Ontario, -2 in Quebec and +24 in Atlantic Canada. He is +6 among men and +18 among women. Among those who say it would be “good to have a change of government, but they don’t feel that strongly about it”, Singh is +28.

Erin O’Toole enjoys a positive impression among 21% and finds negative impressions among 39%, for a net score of -20. O’Toole is -25 in BC, -7 in Alberta, -13 in Man/Sask, -23 in Ontario, -18 in Quebec and -35 in Atlantic Canada. He is -19 among centre voters and +31 among right of centre voters (with less than half registering a positive opinion). Among those who say it would be “good to have a change of government, but they don’t feel that strongly about it”, O’Toole is -14.

Among NDP voters Mr. O’Toole is -53; among Liberal voters he is -47.

Among Conservative voters, Mr. Singh is -26; among Liberal voters he is +23.

Among NDP voters, Mr. Trudeau is -11; among Conservative voters he is -60.

GOVERNMENT APPROVAL

Today 46% approve of the job being done by the Trudeau government, while 39% disapprove. This +7 net score nationally breaks down to a +10 in BC, -15 in Alberta, -11 in Man/Sask, +10 in Ontario, +14 in Quebec, +5 in Atlantic Canada.

Some 19% of Conservative voters approve of the federal government’s performance, as do 32% of BQ voters, 33% of Green Party voters, 41% of NDP voters.

Among those who say it would be “good to have a change of government, but they don’t feel that strongly about it”, 51% approve and 21% disapprove of the Trudeau government.

Among those who say they will definitely vote 47% approve and 41% disapprove.

DESIRE FOR A CHANGE

Today 40% say it’s definitely time for a change in government, which is some 12-points below the reading we found just before election day in 2019. Another 29% would prefer to see a change but don’t feel all that strongly about it.

• Among Conservative voters, 75% are adamant about wanting a change and 23% prefer a change but don’t feel that strongly about it.

• Among NDP voters, 52% are adamant about wanting a change and 35% don’t feel that strongly about it.

• Among Green Party voters, 46% are adamant about wanting a change and 39% don’t feel that strongly about it.

• Among BQ Party voters, 41% are adamant about wanting a change and 30% don’t feel that strongly about it.

UPSHOT

According to Bruce Anderson: “The overall feeling one gets from these numbers is that there are a lot of progressive voters in play, an NDP leader who has built a positive image during the pandemic – but at the same time a fairly muted desire for change in government, and a reasonably good level of approval for the PM and his government.

On the Liberals right flank, there’s some evidence that the Conservative brand is not as strong as it has been in the Prairies, is not terribly competitive in Quebec and Ontario, and the Conservative leader has lost favourability – at a fairly steep pace – during the pandemic.

If the Conservatives have been banking heavily on disaffection with Mr. Trudeau or his government as fuel for their campaign, they may need to find another gear or a different narrative, as swing and centre voters don’t seem drawn to the arguments they are presenting. While their weak appeal with voters on the centre of the spectrum, (the plurality of voters), should be their priority if they are campaigning to win an election, their vulnerability on the right will be their priority if they are worried about not losing ground.”

According to David Coletto: “A 2021 campaign, if it comes this summer, will begin in a very different opinion environment than in 2019.

Although a similar number of people would like to see a change in government, the intensity of that desire is much more muted than in 2019. The country is in a far better mood and the Liberal government has a solid approval rating. The Prime Minister’s personal numbers are much stronger than at this point in 2019 and the opposition Conservatives lack a motivated base, a popular leader, or an issue to galvanize voters around.

It is hard to imagine that an opposition leader (O’Toole) with half as many people with positive views and about equal numbers with negative views as the Prime Minister can challenge for the top job. If anything, NDP leader Jagmeet Singh is the wildcard – he is very appealing to younger voters and has a larger pool of accessible voters than in 2019. If Mr. Trudeau or the Liberals stumble, the NDP is well-positioned to take advantage.”

METHODOLOGY

The survey was conducted with 1,500 Canadian adults from June 28 to 30, 2021. A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.6%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

ABOUT ABACUS DATA

We are the only research and strategy firm that helps organizations respond to the disruptive risks and opportunities in a world where demographics and technology are changing more quickly than ever.

Find out more about what we are doing to help clients respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

We are an innovative, fast-growing public opinion and marketing research consultancy. We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and exceptional value.

We were one of the most accurate pollsters conducting research during the 2019 Canadian Election.

Contact us with any questions.

Find out more about how we can help your organization by downloading our corporate profile and service offering.

Pride Month, A National Reminder to Never Stop Improving

It is officially Pride Month in Canada, and while it may seem like a month-long celebration to most, it is important to also recognize the struggle, protests, and riots, that have paved the path for today’s Pride parades and celebrations of LGBTQ2S+ rights. With homosexuality being decriminalized in Canada one day before the Stonewall Riots (1969) took place in the United States, we would think that Canadians were a little more accepting of their LGBTQ2S+ peers. The Brunswick Four (1974), Operation Soap (1981), and The Sex Garage Raids (1990), all prove that this wasn’t the case. Although it is no longer illegal to be a member of the LGBTQS2+ community in Canada, many community members continue to face discrimination and sometimes even violence.

Knowing that Canadians are truly unique in their experiences and ideologies, we decided to conduct a survey of the general population regarding their perceptions of LBGTQ2S+ rights, respect, and acceptance in the nation. We found that 9% of Canadians identify as a member of the LGBTQ2S+ community. Those 18-29 were among the most likely to identify as LGBTQ2S+ (21%).

1 IN2 BELIEVE THAT LGBTQ2S+ INDIVIDUALS HAVE ALL THE SAME RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS AS EVERY OTHER CANADIAN.

Among the LGBTQ2S+ community, 48% agree that they have all the same rights and freedoms as every other Canadian. This is echoed by 52% of the non-LGBTQ2S+ community.

  • Agreement with this statement is slightly lower among women (50%).
  • Individuals aged 18-29 are significantly more likely to agree that LGBTQ2S+ individuals have some of the same rights and freedoms as every other Canadian than any other age group (24%).

When asked whether they felt Canada was headed in the right or wrong direction regarding LGBTQ2S+ rights, 60% of the LGBTQ2S+ community feel that Canada is headed in the right direction, with 49% of the non-LGBTQ2S+ sample agreeing. Interestingly, only 15% of those not in the LGBTQ2S+ community felt that the country was headed in the wrong direction, with 36% indicating that they were unsure.

LGBTQ2S+ RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS ARE NOT BEING FULLY HONOURED AND RESPECTED IN CANADA.

While 90% of the LGBTQ2S+ population surveyed agrees that LGBTQ2S+ rights are at least somewhat respected and honoured by Canadians, only 22% feel that these rights are fully respected and honoured. This is also the case for 89% and 18% of the non-LGBTQ2S+ community respectively.

  • Those who are 60+ years old are significantly less likely to agree that LGBTQ2S+ rights are fully respected and honoured by Canadians (11%).
  • Those living in Saskatchewan/Manitoba are more likely than any other region to say that LGBTQ2S+ rights are somewhat respected and honoured (45%).

OPINIONS ARE SPLIT REGARDING LGBTQ2S+ ACCEPTANCE IN CANADA.

53% of non-LGBTQ2S+ Canadians feel that LGBTQ2S+ individuals are accepted in Canada, while 42% indicated that LGBTQ2S+ individuals face challenges to their acceptance. Among the LGBTQ2S+ community, a virtually identical number (53%) indicated that they feel that LGBTQ2S+ individuals are accepted, while 44% felt that they faced challenges to their acceptance.

Those 60 years of age or older were significantly more likely than any other group to agree that LGBTQ2S+ individuals face challenges to their acceptance in Canada (51%). The results remain consistent among genders and regions.

When asked whether LGBTQ2S+ acceptance was headed in the right or wrong direction in Canada, the majority of both LGBTQ2S+ individuals (66%) and non-LGBTQ2S+ individuals (56%) agree that the nation is headed in the right direction. Interestingly, a similar number of LGBTQ2S+ (10%) and non-LGBTQ2S+ (11%) individuals agree that the nation is headed in the wrong direction regarding the acceptance of the LGBTQ2S+ community.

Later in the survey, we asked LGBTQ2S+ respondents if they had ever faced discrimination as a direct result of their gender, sexual identity, sexual attraction, or sexual orientation:

1 IN 2 MEMBERS OF THE LGBTQ2S+ COMMUNITY HAVE FACED DISCRIMINATION AS A DIRECT RESULT OF THEIR GENDER, SEXUAL IDENTITY, SEXUAL ATTRACTION, OR SEXUAL ORIENTATION.

49% of those in the LGBTQ2S+ community have faced discrimination as a direct result of their gender, sexual identity, sexual attraction, or sexual orientation. Furthermore, 11% of the LGBTQ2S+ population surveyed felt unsure if this was the case in their specific experiences. Those living in Saskatchewan/Manitoba are significantly more likely to have faced discrimination than those living in any other region in Canada (92%).

THE UPSHOT

According to Michael Monopoli: Although Canada has made tremendous progress regarding the rights, acceptance and respect of the LGBTQ2S+ community, there is still room for improvement. Among the LGBTQ2S+ community, over half declared that they do not have all of the same rights and freedoms as as every other Canadian. And even if they had the same rights and freedoms, there are still barriers present to their acceptance and respect as an individual. Having rights and freedoms on paper means very little when they aren’t fully respected and honoured by every Canadian. I think Pride Month is not only a celebration of the LGBTQ2S+ community and their past struggles and successes, but also a reminder and commitment to strive for a more equitable, inclusive and equal future for every Canadian.

Don’t miss any of our research and analysis, plus get our weekly Worth A Look newsletter. Sign up today.

METHODOLOGY

The survey was conducted with 1,500 Canadians from June 11 to 17, 2021. A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.53%, 19 times out of 20. The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

This poll was conducted and paid for by Abacus Data.

ABOUT ABACUS DATA

We are the only research and strategy firm that helps organizations respond to the disruptive risks and opportunities in a world where demographics and technology are changing more quickly than ever.

Find out more about what we are doing to help clients respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

We are an innovative, fast-growing public opinion and marketing research consultancy. We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and exceptional value.

We were one of the most accurate pollsters conducting research during the 2019 Canadian Election.

Contact us with any questions.

Find out more about how we can help your organization by downloading our corporate profile and service offering.

Liberal fortunes strengthen; Conservatives shed 5 points in a month

Our latest national survey of 2,070 Canadian adults from June 18 to 21, 2021 finds the Liberals opening a 10-point lead over the Conservatives as the federal government’s approval rating improves.

APPROVAL OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

Since our last survey, we see a four-point rise in approval of the federal government’s performance, to 44% with 38% disapprove. While movement on this indicator has been very limited this year, 44% is the highest number we recorded since January.

CURRENT VOTING INTENTION

If an election were held now, the Liberals would win 37% of the vote, the Conservatives 27%, the NDP 18%, the Green Party 5% and the BQ would get 39% in Quebec. The Liberals are up 3 points since mid-June, the Conservatives are down 2, and at the lowest vote share in over four years.

Comparing these results to the outcome of the 2019 election, the Liberals are 4 points higher, the Conservatives 7 points lower, and the NDP 2 points higher.

While regional breakdowns are obviously important, readers are encouraged to read these breaks with appropriate caution, as sample sizes are smaller and margins of error higher.

• In BC we see the NDP (37%) with a 7-point lead over the Liberals (30%) followed by the Conservatives (27%).

• In this wave we see the Conservatives with 39% in Alberta, compared to 34% for the Liberals and 18% for the NDP. The People’s Party claims a 7% share.

• In Saskatchewan/Manitoba we are seeing a close race between the Liberals (34%), the Conservatives (33%) and the NDP (25%).

• The Liberals have a 13-point lead in Ontario, with 42% compared to 29% for the Conservatives and 19% for the NDP.

• In Quebec the BQ (39%) are showing stronger than the Liberals (33%) with the Conservatives well back at 14% and the NDP (5%) and Green Party (6%) essentially tied.

• In Atlantic Canada, we find 50% support for the Liberals followed by the Conservatives at 27% and the NDP at 13%.

Worth noting is that the higher support levels for the Liberals in the Prairie provinces may be an anomaly and reflect smaller cell sizes, but we do also see a 6 point rise in federal approval in Alberta and a 9 point rise in Manitoba/Saskatchewan since the beginning of June.

LEADER IMPRESSIONS

Justin Trudeau enjoys a positive impression among 38% and finds negative impressions among 41%, for a net score of -3.

Erin O’Toole enjoys a positive impression among 19% and finds negative impressions among 40%, for a net score of -21.

Jagmeet Singh enjoys a positive impression among 35% and finds negative impressions among 26% for a net score of +9.

Annamie Paul has seen her negatives increase over the past two weeks. 12% have a positive impression while 25% have a negative one for a net score of -13.

COVID PERFORMANCE

On three measures of federal performance related to the Covid19 pandemic, the federal government has seen generally improving numbers recently.

• On supporting the economic needs of Canadians 41% say Ottawa is doing an excellent or good job compared to 24% poor/terrible for a net +15.

• On finding the right balance between protecting health and the economy, 38% give good marks compared to 29% poor/terrible rating, for a net of +9, up substantially since a -6 net in April.

• But by far the biggest improvement has been on “making sure that Canada receives vaccines in as timely a fashion as possible, with 46% giving the government excellent/good ratings compared to 26% poor/terrible. In roughly a month, the government net score on that item has gone from -8 to +20.

ELECTION SETTING: LIBERALS VERSUS CONSERVATIVES

As election speculation is heating up, we thought it would be useful to compare the situation between the two largest parties in the House today, with where things were before an election call in 2019.

The Liberals trailed by 4 heading into that election, compared to a 10-point lead today. Today’s approval rating for the Trudeau government is 9 points higher than it was in 2019. Impressions of PM Trudeau are 5 points better this year, while impressions of Mr. O’Toole are 14 points lower than they were for Mr. Scheer.

Finally, in August 2019, 53% of voters were determined to see a change in government, today that number is 38%.

A FEW OTHER THINGS WORTH HIGHLIGHTING

SPECTRUM BATTLES

Among self-described left of centre voters, the Liberals have 53% support followed by the NDP at 31% the Conservatives 5%, the Green Party 4% and the BQ 6%.

Among the self-described right of centre voters, the Conservatives have 67% of the vote, followed by the Liberals 14% the NDP 6%, the Peoples’ Party 7%.

Among the largest block of voters, who self-describe as on the centre of the spectrum, the Liberals lead with 36% followed by the Conservatives at 22%, the NDP at 14%, the BQ 15%.

VISIBLE MINORITY

Among those who self describe as visible minority, the Liberals (44%) have a 22-point lead over the Conservatives (22%), followed by the NDP (20%).

URBAN AND RURAL

Among those who live in urban areas the Liberals (38%) have a 15-point lead over the Conservatives (23%), followed by the NDP (20%). In suburban Canada the Liberals lead by 10-points (38%-28%-16%). In rural areas, the Conservatives and Liberals are tied at 33%.

VACCINES AND VOTING INTENTIONS

Among those who have been fully vaccinated the Liberals (42%) have a 13-point lead over the Conservatives (29%), followed by the NDP (16%). Among those who have had one shot the Liberals (39%) have a 16-point lead over the Conservatives (23%), followed by the NDP (22%).

Among those who have had no shots to this point in time, the Conservatives (31%) lead the Liberals (29%) and the NDP (13%) and Greens (9%).

LEADER IMPRESSIONS

Justin Trudeau’s net image (positive impression minus negative impression) in the three biggest seat provinces is +2 in BC, 0 in Ontario and -4 in Quebec. He is +82 among his own party supporters, -5 among NDP voters, and -69 among Conservative voters. Trudeau is -6 among voters under 30.

Jagmeet Singh’s net image in the three biggest seat provinces is +24 in BC, +11 in Ontario and -1 in Quebec. He is +77 among his own party supporters, +24 among Liberal voters, and -38 among Conservative voters. Singh is +36 among voters under 30, and +16 among women.

Erin O’Toole’s net image in the three biggest seat provinces is -20 in BC, -23 in Ontario and -23 in Quebec. He is +55 among his own party supporters, -61 among NDP voters, and -51 among Liberal voters. O’Toole is -23 among voters under 30. He is -13 in Alberta, -20 in Sask/Manitoba, and -27 among men. He is -20 in rural Canada and -23 in urban areas.

UPSHOT

According to Bruce Anderson: “As summer arrives and vaccinations continue to reach more and more people, the Liberals are seeing some wind in their sails. For the Conservatives, the data suggest a continuing struggle to find a message that is compelling or an issue that is galvanizing for them. Their support is softer in the Prairies and rivals on the right are making it more difficult for Mr. O’Toole to fashion a story of momentum, or to find a platform that is uniting western and eastern conservatives, and captivating for non-conservatives. The NDP continues to pose a challenge for the Liberals, especially among younger voters. But for the moment, anyway, progress in ending the pandemic is the focal point for most voters and this is working to ease frustrations with and grow support for the Liberals.”

According to David Coletto: “The Liberals have opened up their largest lead over the Conservatives in three months built on a higher approval rating for the government overall, improving impressions about its handling of the pandemic, and worsening impressions of Mr. O’Toole and the Conservatives. If an election does come this summer, the Liberals are in a much stronger position than they were prior to the start of the 2019 campaign.”

METHODOLOGY

The survey was conducted with 2,070  Canadian adults from June 18 to 21, 2021. A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.2%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

ABOUT ABACUS DATA

We are the only research and strategy firm that helps organizations respond to the disruptive risks and opportunities in a world where demographics and technology are changing more quickly than ever.

Find out more about what we are doing to help clients respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

We are an innovative, fast-growing public opinion and marketing research consultancy. We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and exceptional value.

We were one of the most accurate pollsters conducting research during the 2019 Canadian Election.

Contact us with any questions.

Find out more about how we can help your organization by downloading our corporate profile and service offering.

Canadians see risk but more opportunity in transition; Broad support for policies designed to help an energy shift along

In the latest round of survey work by Clean Energy Canada and Abacus Data, we found 3 out of 4 Canadians believe countries that set higher emissions reduction ambitions will be more successful competitors in the global economy compared to those who set lower ambitions.

While some Canadians see economic risk in the transition away from oil and gas, a majority believe there is more opportunity than risk.

For the world in general, 56% say a shift away from higher carbon energy has more opportunity than risk (44%), and the numbers are virtually identical when the question is asked about the dynamic for Canada in particular. (55%-45%).

Young people are especially convinced of the upside of change. Almost two thirds (62%) of those under 30 see more opportunity, while those who are 60+ are roughly evenly split (48% see more opportunity)

Two-thirds of Liberal and BQ voters and three-quarters of NDP voters see more opportunity than risk. Conversely, almost three-quarters (72%) of Conservative voters see more risk.

When it comes to some specific policies that could help Canada reduce emissions and reach the new targets that the federal government has set, the large majority of people support or are willing to go along with a series of three different ideas that were tested.

The ideas included:

• Setting a new standard requiring auto manufacturers to make more electric vehicles available in the Canadian market.

• Requiring that any new government infrastructure be built using low carbon materials

• Requiring that all electricity in Canada be generated from emission-free sources by the year 2030, compared to the 83% level currently.

No more than 13% oppose any of these measures.

UPSHOT

According to Bruce Anderson: “Canadians are probably best described as ambitous pragmatists – on most issues and in particular when it comes to the changes required to combat climate change. People are aware that change could pose economic dislocation but they believe that lagging this shift would be a worse choice for Canada.

In the latest round of survey work by Clean Energy Canada and Abacus Data, we found 3 out of 4 Canadians believe countries that set higher emissions reduction ambitions will be more successful competitors in the global economy compared to those who set lower ambitions.

While some Canadians see economic risk in the transition away from oil and gas, a majority believe there is more opportunity than risk.

For the world in general, 56% say a shift away from higher carbon energy has more opportunity than risk (44%), and the numbers are virtually identical when the question is asked about the dynamic for Canada in particular. (55%-45%).

Young people are especially convinced of the upside of change. Almost two thirds (62%) of those under 30 see more opportunity, while those who are 60+ are roughly evenly split (48% see more opportunity)

Two-thirds of Liberal and BQ voters and three-quarters of NDP voters see more opportunity than risk. Conversely, almost three-quarters (72%) of Conservative voters see more risk.

When it comes to some specific policies that could help Canada reduce emissions and reach the new targets that the federal government has set, the large majority of people support or are willing to go along with a series of three different ideas that were tested.

The ideas included:

• Setting a new standard requiring auto manufacturers to make more electric vehicles available in the Canadian market.

• Requiring that any new government infrastructure be built using low carbon materials

• Requiring that all electricity in Canada be generated from emission-free sources by the year 2030, compared to the 83% level currently.

No more than 13% oppose any of these measures.

UPSHOT

According to Bruce Anderson: “Canadians are probably best described as ambitous pragmatists – on most issues and in particular when it comes to the changes required to combat climate change. People are aware that change could pose economic dislocation but they believe that lagging this shift would be a worse choice for Canada.

When the theory of change is translated into some specific policy choices that could help catalyze a shift in energy use, the vast majority are inclined to want to be open and supportive of changes in line with a spirit that there is a need to change and more opportunity than risk.”

According to Merran Smith, Clean Energy Canada’s executive director: “People understand the world is changing and that Canada needs to change with it. And encouragingly, this survey shows that when you ask them about specific policy solutions to move us forward, they still remain broadly supportive. The measures we tested are the ones Clean Energy Canada believes the federal government should prioritize to help hit Canada’s new climate target. Not only will these actions make a real dent in our emissions, but it’s clear they’re also well supported by Canadians.”

ABOUT ABACUS DATA

We are the only research and strategy firm that helps organizations respond to the disruptive risks and opportunities in a world where demographics and technology are changing more quickly than ever.

Find out more about what we are doing to help clients respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

We are an innovative, fast-growing public opinion and marketing research consultancy. We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and exceptional value.

We were one of the most accurate pollsters conducting research during the 2019 Canadian Election.

Contact us with any questions.

Find out more about how we can help your organization by downloading our corporate profile and service offering.

METHODOLOGY

The survey was conducted with 1,500 Canadian adults from May 7 to May 12, 2021. A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.6%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

When the theory of change is translated into some specific policy choices that could help catalyze a shift in energy use, the vast majority are inclined to want to be open and supportive of changes in line with a spirit that there is a need to change and more opportunity than risk.”

According to Merran Smith, Clean Energy Canada’s executive director: “People understand the world is changing and that Canada needs to change with it. And encouragingly, this survey shows that when you ask them about specific policy solutions to move us forward, they still remain broadly supportive. The measures we tested are the ones Clean Energy Canada believes the federal government should prioritize to help hit Canada’s new climate target. Not only will these actions make a real dent in our emissions, but it’s clear they’re also well supported by Canadians.”

ABOUT ABACUS DATA

We are the only research and strategy firm that helps organizations respond to the disruptive risks and opportunities in a world where demographics and technology are changing more quickly than ever.

Find out more about what we are doing to help clients respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

We are an innovative, fast-growing public opinion and marketing research consultancy. We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and exceptional value.

We were one of the most accurate pollsters conducting research during the 2019 Canadian Election.

Contact us with any questions.

Find out more about how we can help your organization by downloading our corporate profile and service offering.

METHODOLOGY

The survey was conducted with 1,500 Canadian adults from May 7 to May 12, 2021. A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.6%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

Almost all plan to get a second shot, but a quarter doubt necessity

Abacus Data is proud to be supporting the research and polling for the Faster Together Task Group

The latest Abacus Data research conducted as a contribution to the Faster Together coalition reveals that the number of vaccine-hesitant Canadians has continued to decline, and now numbers 13%, with another 6% indicating they will never take a Covid19 vaccine.

Among those who have already had a first shot of the vaccine, 98% say they have either had their second shot already or intend to take it as soon as possible. Just 2% say they might not bother with the second shot.

While these numbers suggest Canada can expect continued forward momentum in vaccine acceptance, one other question highlights the need to continue to provide education and encouragement about the second shot and its role in health protection from this virus.

Although 74% believe the second shot is “essential” to provide protection from Covid, 15% say it’s a good idea to get the second shot, but not essential, and 11% say they believe the 1st dose provides sufficient protection from their standpoint. Young people in particular seem less convinced about the need for the second shot.

Together these numbers indicate that as many as a quarter of Canadian adults may need continued encouragement and information to make the decision to get the second shot.

[pdf-embedder url=”https://abacusdata.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Faster-Together-Release-June-21.pdf” title=”Faster Together Release June 21″]

THE FASTER TOGETHER COALITION

More than 240 organizations (labour unions, individuals, industry associations, airports, universities, and businesses large and small) have formed to encourage Canadians to be vaccinated against Covid19. Co-chaired by Hassan Yussuff, Past President of the Canadian Labour Congress and Bruce Anderson, Chairman of Abacus Data and a partner in spark*advocacy. Under the banner “Faster, Together” with opinion research contributed by Abacus Data and creative services by Spark Advocacy the group offers more than 400 pieces of creative material that any organization is free to use to reach audiences they have access to.

Faster Together digital ads can be downloaded from this site and used at no cost. A second site explains the work of the coalition and provides a link to provincial sites that can inform them about vaccine availability.

Those who want to join the coalition are welcome simply send an email to banderson@abacusdata.ca or hyussuff@clcctc.ca.

There is no cost to join and no limit on the size of the coalition.

CONTACT

Bruce Anderson, Co-Chair
Abacus Data / spark*advocacy
banderson@abacusdata.ca
613.882.0929

Hassan Yussuff, Co-Chair
Canadian Labour Congress
hyussuff@clcctc.ca 
613.851.7881

METHODOLOGY

The survey was conducted with 1,500 Canadian adults from June 11 to 15, 2021.

A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.6%, 19 times out of 20. The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

ABOUT ABACUS DATA

We are the only research and strategy firm that helps organizations respond to the disruptive risks and opportunities in a world where demographics and technology are changing more quickly than ever.

Find out more about what we are doing to help clients respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

We are an innovative, fast-growing public opinion and marketing research consultancy. We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and exceptional value.

We were one of the most accurate pollsters conducting research during the 2019 Canadian Election.

Contact us with any questions.

Find out more about how we can help your organization by downloading our corporate profile and service offering.

What dads really want for Father’s Day

Father’s Day is this weekend, and with pandemic restrictions relaxed across the nation, many families are eager to safely celebrate with their loved ones and show their fathers how appreciated they really are.

For the majority of those who celebrate (86%), this means finding the perfect Father’s Day gift. But what does that perfect gift look like? We’ve decided to put together a list of the best and worst gifts fathers have received. As it turns out, the way to your father’s heart may be through his stomach. Fathers reported food and drink as the number one gift that they typically like to receive. With this being said, an equal number of fathers tend to be more emotionally involved in the holiday, preferring to spend time with their families instead of receiving gifts.

In terms of who is celebrating Father’s Day this year, fathers themselves, as well as younger Canadians are more likely to celebrate as opposed to their older counterparts. Interestingly, those in Atlantic Canada are among the most likely to be celebrating Father’s Day this year.

Looking at how Canadians celebrate Father’s Day, only 14% of those who celebrate do not typically exchange gifts. But even among those that do, most not spending a fortune on these purchases. Over 7 in 10 Canadians who celebrate will spend $100 or less (72%) with 38% of Canadians spending within the range of $20 to $50.

The most popular gift to give Dad is food (41%), closely followed by clothing (39%) and alcohol (28%). Some fathers typically receive gifts related to technology (22%), or a hobby like sporting goods (19%). These gifts are all typically well received and enjoyed by fathers.

When it comes to gift-giving, Canadians who give gifts favoured store-bought items (45%) for Father’s Day gifts. This is followed by an experience (30%), and finally, something homemade (25%). Even though these are the most frequently given gifts, they aren’t always what dads want to receive. Spending time with family and homemade gifts are at the top of the list according to Dads themselves.

The best gifts received hint that you may not need to visit a store at all this Father’s Day. Rather than spending money, many fathers would much rather have you spend time with them instead. Fathers reported that the best gifts received for Father’s Day were time spent with the family (17%), a homemade gift or card (16%), or an item/experience related to one of their hobbies (9%). For those of us who do plan on getting a gift, we’re going to highlight the Father’s Day gifts that may be best to avoid.

Unsurprisingly, 2 in 5 Fathers indicated that there is no such thing as a bad gift or that all gifts received are appreciated. While you may not need to break the bank, we still recommend giving dad something, as 27% indicated that not receiving a gift was the worst gift of all. Ties (5%), socks (4%), other clothing items (3%), and gift cards (1%) may also leave your dad feeling a little disappointed this year.

This Father’s Day, Dads want to be celebrated by spending time with or hearing from their families (36%). This is followed by a special meal (home-cooked or take-out) (16%), and spending the day relaxing (12%). Just over one in ten fathers also indicated that they wanted to spend Father’s Day like any other day, and did not want to have the spotlight on them.

THE UPSHOT

According to Michael Monopoli: Spending time as a family is the greatest gift a father can ask for. This Father’s Day, I’d suggest putting down the credit card and picking up the phone instead. If visiting dad isn’t something you can safely do at this time, a phone call or zoom meeting can go a long way.  Finally, rather than spending time searching for the perfect gift, spend some time making a homemade gift or a favorite meal for Dad instead. After all, it’s the thought that counts.

And don’t miss any of our research and analysis, plus get our weekly Worth A Look newsletter. Sign up today.

METHODOLOGY

The survey was conducted with 1,500 Canadians from June 4 to 8, 2021. A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.53%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

This poll was conducted and paid for by Abacus Data.

ABOUT ABACUS DATA

We are the only research and strategy firm that helps organizations respond to the disruptive risks and opportunities in a world where demographics and technology are changing more quickly than ever.

Find out more about what we are doing to help clients respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

We are an innovative, fast-growing public opinion and marketing research consultancy. We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and exceptional value.

We were one of the most accurate pollsters conducting research during the 2019 Canadian Election.

Contact us with any questions.

Find out more about how we can help your organization by downloading our corporate profile and service offering.

Liberals lead by 5 but NDP makes big gains

We just completed a national survey of 1,500 Canadian adults (from June 10 to 16, 2021).

Here’s what the survey found:

NATIONAL MOOD CONTINUES TO IMPROVE

There is a continuing upswing in the number of people who say Canada is heading in the right direction, from an ebb of 33% on April 21st to today’s level of 47%. The number of people who say the country is off on the wrong track is 35%, with 18% unsure one way or the other.

“Right track” perceptions are the plurality view everywhere except in the Prairie provinces. Demographically the only group that stands out with a plurality “wrong direction” view is women under 30 (32% right direction – 35% wrong direction).

CURRENT VOTING INTENTION

If an election were held now, the Liberals would win 34% of the vote, the Conservatives 29%, the NDP 21%, the Green Party 6% and the BQ 35% in Quebec. The NDP is up 5-points since the beginning of the month thanks to a spike in the Prairies.

In BC we see a continuing three-way battle.

The Conservatives continue to hold wide leads in the Prairies, although seeing the NDP at 28% in Alberta and 32% in Saskatchewan/Manitoba is worth noting.

The Liberals have a 12-point lead in Ontario, are deadlocked with the BQ in Quebec, and hold a 16-point lead in Atlantic Canada.

Among women under 30, the NDP leads the Liberals by 11 points. Among women aged 30 to 44, the Liberals trail both the Conservatives and the NDP.

LEADER IMPRESSIONS

Justin Trudeau enjoys a positive impression among 39% and finds negative impressions among 39%, for a net score of 0. Trudeau is -2 among women under 30. He is -11 in BC, +5 in Ontario, +20 in Quebec, and +11 in Atlantic Canada.

Erin O’Toole enjoys a positive impression among 19% and finds negative impressions among 36%, for a net score of -17. O’Toole is -21 in BC, -6 in Alberta, -19 in Man/Sask, -20 in Ontario, -16 in Quebec and -18 in Atlantic Canada. He is -18 among men and -17 among women. Among 2019 Conservative voters 56% express a positive view with 26% neutral and 10% negative.

Jagmeet Singh enjoys a positive impression among 32% and finds negative impressions among 26% for a net +6. Singh is +6 in BC, -3 in Alberta, +7 in Man/Sask, +16 in Ontario, -4 in Quebec and +1 in Atlantic Canada. He is 0 among men and +12 among women, including +32 among women under 30.

Asked which of the national party leaders they would like to see become Prime Minister after the next election, Mr. Trudeau is the choice of 30%, Mr. O’Toole (20%) and Mr. Singh (16%).

On this question, Mr. Singh is the first choice of voters under 30 and the second choice of voters 30-44.

Among all women voters, Mr. Trudeau is the first choice of 29%, with Mr. O’Toole and Mr. Singh tied at 18%.

UPSHOT

According to Bruce Anderson: “As speculation about a late summer election heats up, these numbers offer mixed signals for the Liberals, flashing risk signals for the Conservatives, and plenty of opportunity for the NDP.  BC, Quebec, and voters under 45, maybe especially those under 30 – these look to be the key battlegrounds in a campaign in the near term.  Mr. Singh’s opportunity underscores that there is a lot of demand for progressive policy and that he has made a connection with younger voters.  The warning signs for Mr. O’Toole are about tepid feelings for him among Conservative voters, and at the same time, he hasn’t been able to attract much interest from swing voters around the centre of the spectrum.  These numbers do not offer the Liberals a clear path to a majority – especially given the tightness of the contest with the BQ in Quebec and the wandering gaze of younger voters towards the NDP.”

According to David Coletto: “As the summer is set to begin and talk of a late summer or early fall election call grows, the political environment remains quite competitive. The Liberals have an advantage but their support among younger women looks quite tenuous in our data.

The NDP has gained quite a bit of ground in the Prairies while the Conservatives remain stuck at around 30% – a place they have been for quite some time in our tracking.

An improving mood has not translated into more support for the incumbents which might foretell how Canadians could react if asked to vote in an election later this year.”

METHODOLOGY

The survey was conducted with 1,500 Canadian adults from June 10 to 16, 2021. A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.6%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

ABOUT ABACUS DATA

We are the only research and strategy firm that helps organizations respond to the disruptive risks and opportunities in a world where demographics and technology are changing more quickly than ever.

Find out more about what we are doing to help clients respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

We are an innovative, fast-growing public opinion and marketing research consultancy. We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and exceptional value.

We were one of the most accurate pollsters conducting research during the 2019 Canadian Election.

Contact us with any questions.

Find out more about how we can help your organization by downloading our corporate profile and service offering.

Canadians recognize we need to stop COVID everywhere, before this pandemic ends.

In May of 2021, Abacus Data conducted the second wave of the national public opinion survey commissioned by World Vision Canada, a global relief, development, and advocacy organization. As vaccination rates increase and optimism about the end of the pandemic rising, the study explored how Canadians felt about the global impact of Covid-19.

Here is what we found:

CANADIANS HAVE NOT LOST SIGHT OF THE PANDEMIC AS A SERIOUS ISSUE AND WORRY.

Although we have made tremendous progress in our fight against Covid-19 and optimism about our domestic situation has increased, Canada has not changed our underlying worry about Covid-19. The spread of infectious diseases remains the top global concern for Canadians and global variants have become a major concern.

  • 65% are extremely or very concerned with the spread of infectious diseases (down 3 points since May 2020).
  • 70% have thought about the risk of new variants emerging and coming to Canada. This includes 36% who have thought about this a great deal.

As Canadians have had time to process the impacts of the pandemic, many are thinking about what this means for their lives at home, but also about what it means for others around the world.

Canadians are least likely to be preoccupied by the impact on their jobs or future retirement and more likely to be thinking broadly. For example, 6 in 10 spend at least some time thinking about the risk of variants emerging and coming to Canada. Furthermore, 58% spend time thinking about the impact on those living in poor countries around the world.

In fact, nearly 7 in 10 Canadians are following news about the impacts of the pandemic in poorer parts of the world at least a little. While only 7% are following closely, many Canadians are following what’s happening in other parts of the world, including in poorer areas.

NEARLY ALL CANADIANS RECOGNIZE THE MUCH HIGHER RISK OF COVID-19 FACED BY THOSE LIVING IN POVERTY/FRAGILE CONTEXTS.

Canadians recognize that some populations are at higher risk factors for much worse impacts of COVID-19. For example, a large majority of Canadians say the impacts of COVID-19 have much bigger consequences for those who do not have a stable home with access to healthcare.

In fact, compared to the impact on Canadians, a majority recognized that the impacts of COVID-19 will be worse (much worse/worse) for:

  • Those living in high-density communities in poor countries where lots of people live close together 71%
  • Those living in communities in poor countries with limited healthcare facilities and professionals: 71%
  • Those living in war-torn regions where millions have been forced to leave their homes: 69%
  • Children living in refugee or displaced persons camps: 69%
  • The world’s most vulnerable populations: 68%
  • Those living in refugee or displaced persons camps: 68%
  • Those living in areas with high levels of poverty: 69%

Canadians recognize that the impact of COVID-19 at home will be nowhere near as bad as it is for those living in places that are more vulnerable, such as for those living in poverty and fragile contexts around the world. This does not, however, mean that they fully understand the challenges that these more vulnerable populations face. Consider vaccination rates.

CANADIANS OVERESTIMATE THE VACCINATION RATES AROUND THE WORLD

Canadians consistently overestimate the percentage of populations around the world that have received at least one vaccination. Forty-eight percent of Canadians believe that the percent of those vaccinated in refugee or displaced persons camps is more than 5%. This sentiment is echoed in perceptions of vaccinations of those living in Africa (62%) and Syria (61%).

World Vision surveyed almost 350 households in refugee contexts like Jordan, Venezuela and the DRC, and only 1 person had been vaccinated. So, while Canadians understand that vaccination rates in these places are lower, they underestimate the scope of the disparity.

A majority (61%) of Canadians believe that it is morally wrong that people living in richer countries have access to vaccines before those in poorer countries. It is not, however, just a moral imperative. Canadians understand that what happens in the rest of the world has impacts here.

AS MUCH AS THEY ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THE CONSEQUENCES FOR THOSE LIVING ABROAD, CANADIANS ALSO SEE THE GLOBAL SPREAD OF COVID-19 AS HAVING A DIRECT IMPACT ON THEIR OWN LIFE BACK IN CANADA.

A large majority of Canadians (85%) are at least somewhat worried about new variants of Covid-19 developing somewhere else and coming to Canada. Nearly 3 out of 10 Canadians reported being extremely concerned that this will happen over the next year.

This is also seen through our outlook on our economic recovery. Canadians (82%) are at least somewhat worried that worsening COVID infections in less developed parts of the world will lead to a slow economic recovery in Canada.

Canadians understand the implications of COVID-19 spreading within these camps, and they also see the potential for a wider impact on more than just those living in these camps. A majority of Canadians (78%) recognize that if we don’t vaccinate everyone in the world, new variants will continue to surface. Two-thirds agree that the vaccination rate impacts us all such that none of us are vaccinated until all of us are vaccinated.

74% of Canadians feel that with our world being so interconnected, a return to normal cannot be possible until the spread of the disease is under control across the globe.

Furthermore, 87% of Canadians believe that a variant emerging from a refugee camp has the potential to make its way into Canada and potentially even put us back into a restricted lifestyle. Nearly 8 in 10 Canadians think that the scenario might happen, while a third feel that this is likely to happen.

THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA’S RESPONSE TO HELPING WITH THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC GLOBALLY

Canadians currently believe that the Canadian government’s response to helping poorer countries has been “too little” (29%; an increase of 16 points from May 2020).

There is widespread support for (81%) and very little resistance to the Canadian government ensuring that excess vaccines that Canada has purchased go to the world’s poorest and more vulnerable populations.

Support is also high for several other initiatives. Waiving intellectual rights on COVID vaccines so that poorer countries can manufacture them quickly is supported by 7 in 10 and two-thirds support Canada increasing contributions to COVAX and working with other rich countries to ensure everyone gets vaccinated in poorer countries.

UPSHOT

According to our other polling, Canadians are increasingly of the belief that the worst of the pandemic is behind us. We are entering the hope phase of the pandemic as vaccination rates increase and cases decline in most of the country. We should not confuse this with a sense that the pandemic is over or that Canadians are not still preoccupied with the pandemic.

The top global issue continues to be the spread of infectious diseases. More importantly, there is a concern and worry about new variants and their impact not only on our health but on our economic recovery. Many even recognize the possibility that our failure to vaccinate everyone in the world could lead to a vaccination-resistant strain of COVID-19.

The short of it is that a full COVID-19 recovery in Canada means a COVD-19 recovery worldwide.

METHODOLOGY

This survey was commissioned and paid for by World Vision Canada. It was conducted with 2,000 Canadian adults from May 26 to June 1, 2021. A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.19%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.