WHAT DO WE LOOK FOR IN A POLITICAL LEADER?

As the Conservative and New Democratic parties are going to choose new leaders, we asked Canadians about the qualities they would want to see in a political leader. This more detailed work will be released in the next few days.

But first, we wanted to highlight the results of two questions, dealing with the age and gender of a political leader. Here’s what we asked:

1. If the choice of a new leader for a political party came down to a man or a woman, and both were equally qualified, would you pick the man or the woman?

2. If the choice of a new leader for a political party came down to a person under 50 or a person over 50, would you pick the younger or older person?

Here’s what we found:

• In the gender-based contest, the woman would win (54%).

• While 31% of women would vote for the man even more (38%) of men would vote for the woman.

• Younger men and younger women tilted things about 4-5 points in favour of the female candidate, indicating that generational change is helping propel this shift in thinking.

• Conservative voters would choose the man (63%). Notably, 52% of female Conservative voters would vote for the man, 21 points higher than average. In contrast, 77% of female NDP voters and 69% of female Liberal voters would pick the woman.

• In the age-based contest, the younger candidate would win handily. By a 30-point margin (65%-35%), Canadians would prefer someone under 50.

• It is perhaps expected that younger people preferred the younger candidate, but even 50% of those 60 and older did as well.

• There was no significant gender difference on this match up.

• Again, political affiliation was a key driver in behaviour. Conservative voters were more likely to prefer the older candidate than Liberal or NDP voters. Fully half (50%) of Conservatives under 45 would pick the older candidate compared to 22% of NDP voters under 45 and 16% of Liberal voters under 45.

When we combine preferences for the age and gender of potential party leaders, we find that more Canadians prefer a young female candidate to any other combination. 37% would prefer a young female candidate, all else being equal, while 27% would prefer a combination of young and male. 20% would prefer an older male while 17% would prefer an older woman.

Conservative voters are most likely to prefer an older male candidate (43%) and least likely to prefer a younger female candidate (13%). NDP voters are most likely to prefer a younger female candidate (44%) and least likely to prefer an older male (14%).

THE UPSHOT

Bruce Anderson: “Rather than prove that stereotyping by gender or age no longer exists, these results tend to say that people still harbour some biases, but the nature of the biases has been shifting – in directions that favour younger and female candidates. It’s apparent that, as with many of the shifting social attitudes that we see today, younger generations have been leading the shift, but perhaps it’s even more remarkable that older people seem unsure that older leaders would be better.

On the gender question, the numbers suggest women have been convincing more men that they have good leadership qualities, than men have been convincing women.

The breakdowns by partisanship reveal again that Liberal and NDP voters have much in common and that both see the world and politics somewhat differently from Conservative voters.

David Coletto: “This admittedly simple study provides further evidence that Canadian voters might prefer, all else being equal, female political leaders. Remember our survey experiment in January 2015? We asked respondents to pick between images of Jane and Perry and found Jane would win hands down, even after we changed her policy positions. This more recent data confirms what we found then – all else being equal, most Canadians, except perhaps Conservative voters, would prefer the female candidate over the male one.

Add in age and we find that younger candidates are more appealing to voters generally, and especially among younger voters and those who support the NDP and Liberals. Again, Conservative voters are the exception, with a majority preferring the older candidate, including younger Conservative voters.

Does this mean female party leaders will do always better, all else being equal? Maybe. Recent provincial election results in BC, Ontario, and Alberta suggest that might be the case. Obviously there is more to a candidate than their age or sex but as we learned from our Jane vs. Perry test, a candidate’s gender might be a cue for other attributes that we want in our leaders.”

METHODOLOGY

Our survey was conducted online with 2,010 Canadians aged 18 and over from August 22 to 25, 2016. A random sample of panelists was invited to complete the survey from a large representative panel of over 500,000 Canadians.

The Marketing Research and Intelligence Association policy limits statements about margins of sampling error for most online surveys. The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of 2,010 is +/- 2.2%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

Abacus Data Inc.

We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and value-added insight. Our team combines the experience of our Chairman Bruce Anderson, one of Canada’s leading research executives for two decades, with the energy, creativity and research expertise of CEO David Coletto, Ph.D.

Ask us a question.  We’re here to help.

CANADIANS BULLISH ON CANADA

In our latest national survey of 2,010 Canadian adults, we asked Canadians what they thought about the potential for Canada to win new investment from around the world.

ATTRACTING INVESTMENT TO CANADA

Prime Minister Trudeau has been making a case for inbound foreign investment, and two in three (65%) are inclined to believe there are real opportunities for Canada to become a place more companies want to invest in growing. About one in three (35%) feel differently, judging the effort hopeful, but unlikely to succeed.

Majorities in every region sense real opportunities, with those living in BC (72%) and Atlantic Canada (79%) leading the bullish sentiment and Quebecers lagging (57%).

Young and old, men and women were equally optimistic about the potential.

Optimism was the majority view across the political spectrum, with Liberal voters particularly bullish, and Conservatives somewhat more skeptical than others.

8 IN 10 FEEL THIS SHOULD BE A PRIORITY FOR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

Eight in ten Canadians feel that trying to attract new investment into Canada should be a major or significant priority for the federal government.

More than 3 in 4 people in every region want inbound investment promotion to be a major or significant priority for Ottawa. Conservatives, Liberals and New Democrats are unusually aligned in believing this is important work for the federal government.

WHAT WOULD ATTRACT POTENTIAL INVESTORS?

We asked respondents about Canada’s strengths or weaknesses when it comes to attracting potential investors into Canada.

• Canadians say our 5 most appealing attributes are resources (74%), energy (61%), scenery (57%), cultural diversity (56%) and tolerance of differences.

• Close behind were Canada’s law and order (51%), our universities (51%), and our cities (50%) as major strengths.

• While fewer consider them “major strengths”, large majorities felt that our knowledge of the world, and our work ethic were advantages when it comes to attracting investment.
• Our most notable perceived weaknesses were our climate and level of taxation. In the case of taxation, a slight majority see that as a weakness for Canada.

• Areas where the results suggest Canadians believe there is room to improve somewhat include our regulatory system, our transportation system, and our broadband networks. A small minority felt these were weaknesses, but few felt they were major strengths.

Looking at differences across political affiliation, we find that:

Liberal voters tend to be the most enthused about Canada’s strengths almost across the board, with Conservative voters generally less so, and NDP voters in the middle. Supporters of all three parties tend to agree on the value of our natural resources, scenery.

The biggest gap between Liberal and Conservative voters is on the value of cultural diversity and tolerance of differences.



THE UPSHOT

Bruce Anderson: “Given the geopolitical turmoil that has marked recent years, including the uncertainty surrounding Brexit, the Prime Minister’s efforts to invite global investors to consider Canada, combined with higher media profile for Canada in recent months, is an economic x-factor that bears watching closely.

Because Canadian governments have long made efforts to win global investment for Canada, it remains to be seen whether these times and these efforts by Mr. Trudeau will result in greater success – but for the moment, the large majority of people think this work is important for the federal government – and 2 out of 3 feel there are reasons to feel optimistic.

What’s interesting as well is that many Canadians sense that our strengths may start with abundant resources and energy but also include cultural diversity, a solid work ethic, and good universities. The fact that many wonder if our taxation levels are a drawback probably indicates that governments have some room to use tax incentives as part of a strategy to develop more inbound investment.

David Coletto: “Most Canadians feel optimistic that Canada can attract new investment from global companies and think the federal government should make it a significant priority. Trade missions and international trips that raise Canada’s profile and seek out new investors are things most Canadians support their political leaders doing.

There’s little we see as hurdles preventing Canada from doing better. Most recognize that our natural resources, access to energy, our diversity, and tolerance of others are assets that separate Canada from other markets. First-class universities, a good work ethic, and our stable political system are all strengths when it comes to attracting investment.

Many feel our tax rates could be lower and the weather a bit less frigid, but all in all, we generally agree that Canada has a lot to offer the world and businesses that want to invest and do business here.”

METHODOLOGY

Our survey was conducted online with 2,010 Canadians aged 18 and over from August 22 to 25, 2016. A random sample of panelists was invited to complete the survey from a large representative panel of over 500,000 Canadians.

The Marketing Research and Intelligence Association policy limits statements about margins of sampling error for most online surveys. The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of 2,010 is +/- 2.2%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

Abacus Data Inc.

We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and value-added insight. Our team combines the experience of our Chairman Bruce Anderson, one of Canada’s leading research executives for two decades, with the energy, creativity and research expertise of CEO David Coletto, Ph.D.

THE ECONOMIC MOOD IS WARMING

PdfExport

HEALTH OF THE CANADIAN ECONOMY

When the federal Liberals took office, the mood of Canadians on the economy was fairly gloomy: only 32% said it was in good shape. That number has climbed to 52%. In every region, feelings about the economy have improved since May. The greatest gains are in Quebec (+18), Alberta (+13), SK/MB (+9), and in Atlantic Canada (+8).

GROWTH OR RECESSION?

The number of people who saw growth in the economy hit a bottom in January, at 28%. Today, a majority say the economy is growing (55%).

OPTIMISM OR PESSIMISM ABOUT THE FUTURE?

Asked to predict how the economy will do over the next six months, we find two optimists (29%) for every pessimist (14%). Optimism is greater than pessimism everywhere in the country, including in Alberta where 29% expect things to improve compared with 22% who feel things will worsen.

Worth noting is that many of those who feel good about the economy today tend to feel that even better times lie ahead. Few of those who feel the economy is in poor shape expect it to get worse – but neither do they expect it to improve.

THE UPSHOT

Bruce Anderson: “The last election saw incumbents trying to run on their economic record, even as people felt the economy was not in great shape.

While today’s results do not describe a buoyant economic mood, there is doubtless some relationship between the popularity of the new government and the feeling that the economy may be on the mend – what’s never entirely clear is whether this is a question of confidence strengthening – or fears abating – or real economic activity improving in ways that are noticeable on the ground for people.

Perhaps most interesting is that the mood in Alberta is improving, despite the fact that oil prices have only stabilized, rather than recovered. While there remains broad anxiety, there is at least more optimism than pessimism about what the future looks like.”

David Coletto: “Canadians are feeling increasingly good about the state of the economy and the prospects for the next six months. In every region of the country, the mood has improved, most noticeably in Quebec and Alberta. For the first time since July 2015, a majority of Canadians believe the Canadian economy is doing well and growing. The political implications are that the federal government may not feel public pressure to stimulate the economy through fiscal policy giving it room to focus on other parts of its agenda including innovation, healthcare, and Indigenous affairs.”

In case you missed it…

Grit support broadening with time (August 29, 2016)

METHODOLOGY
Our survey was conducted online with 2,010 Canadians aged 18 and over from August 22 to 25, 2016. A random sample of panelists was invited to complete the survey from a large representative panel of over 500,000 Canadians.

The Marketing Research and Intelligence Association policy limits statements about margins of sampling error for most online surveys. The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of 2,010 is +/- 2.2%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

Abacus Data Inc.

We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and value-added insight. Our team combines the experience of our Chairman Bruce Anderson, one of Canada’s leading research executives for two decades, with the energy, creativity and research expertise of CEO David Coletto, Ph.D.

Ask us a question!

GRIT SUPPORT BROADENING WITH TIME

PdfExport

Our latest survey interviewed more than 2,000 respondents and covered a host of political topics.

Our first release from this package of data covers the regular political bases.

ACCESSIBLE VOTER POOLS

At the beginning of 2015, all three major parties had accessible voter pools of a similar size. Today, the Liberals have a 20-point advantage over the NDP and a 22-point advantage over the Conservatives. To some degree, one might argue that this has something to do with the fact that the Conservatives and the NDP don’t have permanent leaders, except this gap really had emerged by the end of the last election campaign.

Today, 67% say they would consider voting Liberal, compared to just 47% for the NDP and 45% for the Conservatives. The gap in accessible voter pool is arguably the Liberals strongest asset and the critical factor that new leaders of the NDP and Conservatives will need to change if their goal is to form a government.

Slide1

CURRENT VOTING INTENTION

A year ago, all three major parties were polling within three points of each other. Today the gap from first to third is 30 points.

If there were an election tomorrow, the Liberals would win 46% support, 6-points better than their result last fall. The Conservatives are steady at 28% while the NDP is at 16%. Both the NDP and Conservative are four points below their election result last year.Regional breakdowns show the Liberals with a 23-point lead (over the NDP) in Quebec, a 23-point lead in BC, and a 17-point lead in Ontario.

Slide2

Regional breakdowns show the Liberals with a 23-point lead (over the NDP) in Quebec, a 23-point lead in BC, and a 17-point lead in Ontario.

When it comes to gender, the Liberals lead by 15 points among men, and by 22 points among women. They lead among all age groups with a 30-point lead among those under 30 and a 12-point lead among those 60+.

Slide7

Breaking down these results a bit more reveals the Conservatives greater challenge is among women under 45, where the party is 29-points behind the Liberals.

Slide8

Another critical pattern is the difference between urban and rural voters, especially west of Ontario. West of Ontario, the Conservatives have a narrow lead among rural voters, while the Liberals have become highly competitive in urban and suburban areas. East of Manitoba, the Conservatives are far behind the Liberals in urban and suburban areas and are 14 points back in rural areas.

Slide10

The relative competitiveness of the Conservative Party in rural Canada is mostly a function of how men feel about their choices. Among rural men, the two parties are only 4 points apart. Among rural women, the Liberals have a 17-point lead.

Slide9

APPROVAL OF THE GOVERNMENT

Our latest survey finds 57% approve of the job the federal government led by Justin Trudeau is doing, the highest number we have recorded since he took office, and 25-points above where Mr. Harper stood entering the last election.

Slide13

Approval levels are above 50% across the country with the exception of Alberta, where 39% approve and 47% disapprove. The Liberals obtained 25% of the vote in Alberta last fall.

Slide14
Slide15

Approval of the government is above 50% among all religious groups, except Evangelical Christians, among whom 39% approve, and 46% disapprove of the Trudeau government.

Slide21

Approval levels are higher among those whose household income is below $200,000, but even among those above that threshold, approval is 49%, disapproval 33%.

Slide19
Slide22

Perhaps the most interesting stories under the surface of broad approval is the fact that the Trudeau government is winning the approval of the broad majority of those on the left (above 70%), the majority (53%) of those on the centre, and even the plurality of those on the centre right (48%-34%). It is only the relatively small portion of the population who self-describes themselves as “right” (7%) where the majority disapproves.

Finally, while the economic mood is improving (more on that in a later release this week), only about half of the population feels the economy is in good shape today, the other half would say poor or very poor. Among the 42% who say the economy is “poor,” more people approve (44%) than disapprove of the performance of the government.\

Slide23


THE UPSHOT

Bruce_Anderson

Bruce Anderson: “For many months now, some have wondered if the popularity of the new government would survive the inevitable tough policy tests it would face. As the new government closes in on a year in office, with the inevitable challenges that have occurred, some critical choices have been made, and public support remains pretty robust.

Perhaps more interesting is that the extensive regional and partisan polarization that has marked Canadian politics for several years may be dissipating. Voters on the centre right seem pleased with the choices the government is making as do those on the left. Many voters in the West, who didn’t vote for this government, seem to be accepting the choices Mr. Trudeau is making.

For the other two major parties, this establishes that they cannot take for granted that their approach to the next election can be about rallying a base against the incumbents: they will need to increase the appeal of their parties among those who would not currently consider them.

About 1 in 5 NDP voters has drifted towards the Liberals, and the number of Conservative voters who are angry at the Liberals is far less than would be needed to win an election.”

David2

David Coletto: “The broad public support for the Liberal government we saw soon after the election has persisted and strengthened. Approval is up 5-points since March and the Liberals would win a larger share of the vote today than they did in last year’s election.

Part of this extended run of goodwill might be explained by the fact that Mr. Trudeau lacks any alternatives for Canadians to compare as potential replacements. More likely, the popularity of Mr. Trudeau and his government is a result of its approach to governing and the emotional connection it has made with millions of Canadians, including many who didn’t vote Liberal. Despite some challenges and mistakes, the Liberals have governed like Canadians expected they would. They promised a progressive, positive, and ambitious government. Most progressive Canadians, and even some of those on the right, are happy with what they have seen so far.”

METHODOLOGY
Our survey was conducted online with 2,010 Canadians aged 18 and over from August 22 to 25, 2016. A random sample of panelists was invited to complete the survey from a large representative panel of over 500,000 Canadians.

The Marketing Research and Intelligence Association policy limits statements about margins of sampling error for most online surveys. The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of 2,010 is +/- 2.2%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

Abacus Data Inc.

We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and value-added insight. Our team combines the experience of our Chairman Bruce Anderson, one of Canada’s leading research executives for two decades, with the energy, creativity and research expertise of CEO David Coletto, Ph.D.

Ask us a question today!

THE FUTURE AS CANADIANS SEE IT – WORK, HEALTH & TECHNOLOGY

In our recent nationwide survey, we asked Canadians to tell us whether they thought a series of scenarios were likely or unlikely to transpire over the next 10 or 20 years.

Our first release can be found here.

Here are our findings on items related to science and technology:

• Most (75%) believe that in the next ten years a way will have been found to store energy from wind and solar for future use.

• Two thirds (65%) believe there will be driverless cars on our streets and highways.

• More than half (56%) think there will be more electric than gas powered cars.

• Almost half think humans will have landed on Mars (46%), and 35% think there will be commercial flights in space.

• Four in ten (44%) think Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions will be declining sharply, while 35% think global emissions will be declining sharply.

When it comes to the future of work and heath:

• 79% think it is likely that nurses will perform many of the health services performed by physicians in 10 years.

• 69% think that more people will smoke marijuana than cigarettes.

• Just under half (48%) believe unions will be stronger and have more members.

• 44% think most cancers will be curable and 39% believe the average Canadian will live to 100 years.

• 40% believe most people will work from home and 38% think the average work week will be 4 days long.

Comparing views across political lines, we find:

• Large majorities across all three major parties, believe energy storage solutions will be found for wind and solar.

• Liberals are more likely than others to think there will be more electric than gas cars on the roads in 10 years, the average work week will be 4 days long, most people will work from home, and more will smoke marijuana than tobacco.

• Liberals and New Democrats are more convinced that Canada’s GHG emissions will be declining sharply, compared to Conservatives.

• Liberal and NDP supporters are more likely to think that humans will land on Mars.

Slide13
Slide14
Slide9
Slide10

Comparing Outlook for 10 years and 20 years

Half our sample was asked the likelihood that certain events would occur in 10 years while the other was asked about a longer time horizon of 20 years. Some findings:

• Given a 20 year horizon rather than 10, Canadians were roughly 10 points more likely to think energy storage solutions would be found, there will be driverless cars on our streets, more electric than gas cars, humans would visit Mars, commercial flights would go into space, and most cancers would be curable.

• 59% thought Canada’s emissions would be declining sharply in 20 years compared with 44% who thought this was likely in 10.

• Adding 10 years to the horizon also made more people imagine the average lifespan would be 100.

• In contrast, there were more doubts about the future of unions, the longer the outlook.

Slide16
Slide12


THE UPSHOT

Bruce Anderson: “Canadians are known to be risk-averse, but these numbers suggest that they are not necessarily change-averse. Several of these findings suggest there is a fair bit of optimism about the potential for technology and imagination to change our world for the better: lengthening life spans, reducing environmental impacts, and expanding our understanding of space.

Correctly or not, many Canadians believe technology will be an important part of the solutions needed to reduce carbon emissions. Public expectations for the pace of emissions reduction may disappoint some, but there are few who foresee a future where Canada is not making real progress in this area, at least over the coming 20 years.”

David Coletto: “How will our lives change in 10 to 20 years? Canadians can imagine a world that is healthier and powered by renewable energy and new technologies that today are being developed. Many of us can see streets filled with driverless, electric cars powered by energy generated by the sun and wind. We see nurses peforming many of the same health services as physicians while most of us live into our 90s and 100s.

These findings suggest that since many Canadians expect rapid changes in technology, energy, and health, our ability to adapt and cope with those changes will be easier and less surprising. The speed at which things have changed in the past 20 years has primed us to expect even fast change in the next 20.”

METHODOLOGY

Our survey was conducted online with 1,500 Canadians aged 18 and over from June 14 to 16, 2016. A random sample of panelists was invited to complete the survey from a large representative panel of over 500,000 Canadians.

The Marketing Research and Intelligence Association policy limits statements about margins of sampling error for most online surveys. The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of 1,500 is +/- 2.6%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

Abacus Data Inc.

We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and value added insight. Our team combines the experience of our Chairman Bruce Anderson, one of Canada’s leading research executives for two decades, with the energy, creativity and research expertise of CEO David Coletto, PhD.

CANADIANS LOOK INTO THE FUTURE

PdfExport

In our recent nationwide survey, we asked Canadians to tell us whether they thought a series of scenarios were likely or unlikely to transpire over the next 10 or 20 years.

We are releasing the results over the next few days, grouping some items together for ease of presentation.

When it comes to our media and political life:

• The majority (56%) think it’s likely that Canada will have a gay Prime Minister within the next ten years. Almost as many (44%) say it’s likely that a Muslim will lead one of our major political parties.

• Half (51%) think there will be no more printed newspapers and 22% think there will be no more national news broadcasts on TV.

• 7% think Alberta will separate from Canada (11% in Alberta), and 18% think Quebec will separate (20% among Quebecers).

• 46% believe that women will have more power and influence than men in Canada, slightly higher among men (49%) than among women (44%).

Comparing views across political lines, a few observations:

• New Democrats are more likely to believe that there will be a gay PM and a Muslim leader

• Liberals are more likey to believe women will have more influence than men.

• 62% of Liberals foresee no printed newspapers, compared to 51% among Conservatives.

When it comes to global affairs:

• Two out of three (66%) think Canada will play a more important role in the world.

• 42% think the US will play a smaller role in the world.

• 41% think the EU will break up.

• 23% think China will be a democracy.

• 11% expect there will be a durable peace in the Middle East.

• 9% think Canada and the US will be one country.

• 7% think a tunnel will connect North America and China.

Again, looking at results across party lines:

• Liberals are most likely (83%) to say Canada will play a more important role, but majorities of each parties’ supporters feel this way.

• There were fewer differences across party lines on the other questions.

Slide1
Slide3
Slide5
Slide6


Comparing Outlook for 10 years and 20 years

Half our sample was asked the likelihood that certain events would occur in 10 years while the other was asked about a longer time horizon of 20 years. Some findings:

• 62% thought it was likely that there would be no printed news papers in Canada in 20 years compared to 51% in a 10 year period.

• 54% thought there would be a Muslim major party leader in 20 years compared to 44% who said that would happen in 10.

Slide2
Slide8

• 75% believed Canada will play a more important role in the world 20 years from now, 65% felt the same in 10 years.

THE UPSHOT

Bruce Anderson: “The numbers tend to speak to an optimism about the country and a comfort with our values. We don’t expect our country to break up, or merge with the US, and we do expect it will have more influence in the world.

There is uncertainty about the course of global geopolitics, including the future of China, the US, and the EU, but pessimism about peace in the Middle East.

In terms of our own domestic politics, the numbers signal at least some confidence that bias-based barriers to high office are limited and possibly reducing over time.”

Our next release will explore our expectations about health, life, and technology.

METHODOLOGY

Our survey was conducted online with 1,500 Canadians aged 18 and over from June 14 to 16, 2016. A random sample of panelists was invited to complete the survey from a large representative panel of over 500,000 Canadians.

The Marketing Research and Intelligence Association policy limits statements about margins of sampling error for most online surveys.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of 1,500 is +/- 2.6%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

Abacus Data Inc.

We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and value added insight. Our team combines the experience of our Chairman Bruce Anderson, one of Canada’s leading research executives for two decades, with the energy, creativity and research expertise of CEO David Coletto, PhD.

The Surprising Source Millennials are Turning to for Travel Money

It’s no secret how much Millennials love to travel. In fact, one study found that 87% of Millennials saw travel as a very important aspect of their lifestyle, and 86% planned to travel the globe as much as possible in their life.

However, Millennials face one major obstacle to making their wanderlust a reality- finances. Due to increased strain on the economy, and overall delayed adulthood, many Millennials are having trouble moving out of their parents’ homes, let alone jetting off to Thailand.

But finances aren’t stopping the most enterprising members of our generation. Instead, they are looking to ‘crowdfund’ their adventures.

A phenomenon driven by websites like ‘GoFundMe’ and ‘Kickstarter’, crowdfunding is defined as “the raising of funds through the collection of small contributions from the general public (known as the crowd) using the Internet and social media”.

This Millennial trend has not gone unnoticed. This week, AirCanada launched a website called Embarq that will serve as a platform for users to crowdfund their flights.

While the site is open to use by anyone, it’s clear who the focus is. One need only watch the Embarq trailer to see the definite focus on Gen Y.

In fact, Air Canada has explicitly acknowledged their focus on Millennials. In an interview with the Globe and Mail, Selma Filali, Air Canada’s director of marketing communications said, “We know that millennials have more audacious travel plans than ever before. They really want to see the world but they really lack the funds to make that a reality.”
While Emarq is the first website of its kind developed by an airline, it is probable that other companies will soon follow suite. It is unlikely that our Millennial love of travel will end any time soon.


Would you like to know more about Millennials as consumers? Contact us to discover our full range of research and analytical services.

Which Millennial type is most likely to travel abroad and want to fully experience life in a new place? : The Spark

Significant Difference Between American and Canadian Millennials on Abortion, Suicide, and more

Our latest nationwide survey included questions on what people consider to be morally acceptable or morally wrong.

See our earlier releases here and here.

Here’s a look at generational differences, particularly looking at Canadian Millennials (those born between 1980 and 2000). Here’s what we found:

Generations largely agreed (within five percentage points) on:

  • Birth Control and abortion;
  • Sex between an unmarried man and woman; gay or lesbian relations; married men and women having an affair;
  • Gambling

Millennials were more likely to find the following morally acceptable:

  • Smoking marijuana for recreational purposes (68% of those 18-34; 60% of those 55+)
  • Pornography (66% of those 18-34; 54% of those 35-54; 32% of those 55+)
  • Suicide (38% of those 18-34; 26% of those 35-54; 27% of those 55+)
  • Cloning animals (34% of those 18-34; 28% of those 35-54; 27% of those 55+)
  • Cloning humans (21% of those 18-34; 15% of those 35-54; 7% of those 55+)

Millennials were less likely to find the following morally acceptable:

  • Doctor-assisted dying (72% of those 18-34; 81% of those 35-54; 83% of those 55+)
  • The death penalty (49% of those 18-34; 61% of those 35-54; 61% of those 55+)
  • Buying and wearing clothing made of animal fur (38% of those 18-34; 41% of those 35-54; 55% of those 55+)
  • Medical testing on animals (29% of those 18-34; 38% of those 35-54; 49% of those 55+)

We also considered the differences between Canadian Millennials and American Millennials. Here are some interesting comparisons between the American 18-34 demographic versus our own (using the latest publicly available American data from 2013):

  • Only 49% of American Millennials deemed pornography morally acceptable versus 66% of Canadian Millennials (17 point difference)
  • 74% of American Millennials thought gay and lesbian relations were morally acceptable compared to 84% of Canadian Millennials (10 point difference). An interesting point to consider here is that gay marriage was legalized in Canada 2005, compared to a full ten years later in The States. For the majority of Canadian Millennials adult-lives, gay marriage has been legal, which could have a definite impact on shaping moral views in Canada that would have been absent for the same age cohort in the US.
  • American versus Canadian Millennial views on animal fur are 58% v 38% (20 point difference)
  • Similarly on Medical Testing on animals, 47% of young Americans agree versus 29% of young Canadians (18 point difference)
  • A significant gap exists on the topic of abortion- 48% of American Millennials v 68 of Canadian Millennials. (20 point difference)
  • Suicide is seen as much more morally permissible by Canadian Millennials at 38 per cent compared to 17 percent of Americans of the same age. However, the largest gap between North American Millennials is over the issue of doctor assisted suicide. A mere 46% of young American see it as morally acceptable compared to a full 72% of young Canadians. That is a 26 point difference.
  • We do share views on a few things, however. Namely: Cloning humans (US 19, CA 21), cloning animals (US 37, CA 34), and married men and women having affairs (US 7, CA 13).

A truly interesting dynamic emerges when comparing generational difference in the US versus that in Canada. Data indicates that generations in the US are more divided than those in Canada. Take the follow examples:

  • There is a 23 point gap between Millennials and Boomers in America on the topic of gay and lesbian relations (74% of Millennials versus  51% of the 55+ demographic). In Canada, the gap between the youngest and oldest generations is only 4 points. (84% of Millennials versus 80% of the 55+ demographic)
  • On the topic of having a baby outside marriage, there is a 14 point gap between American Millennials (71) and Boomers (57). This is compared to only a 6 point gap between Canadian Millennials (82) and and Boomers (88).
  • Finally, when asked about unmarried sex, there was a 16 point gap in American opinion (72 v 56) compared to only a 1 point gap among Canadians (86 v 85).

THE UPSHOT:

While there are some meaningful differences between generations, overall, Canadians fundamentally appear to hold the same moral values. Several things stand out:

Given their status as digital natives, Millennials seem more comfortable with technology than their older counterparts. For example, Millennials were a full 14 points more comfortable with human cloning than the 55+ demographic (21% versus 7%).

However, Millennials are seemingly more protective of animals, with a full 20% separating Millennials and Boomers on the question of medical testing on animals (29% versus 49%). They are also uncomfortable with buying and wearing clothing made of animal fur, with only 29% deeming it morally acceptable.

An interesting generational divide is also visible over issues of suicide and doctor assisted dying. While Millennials are more morally open to the idea of suicide(38%-26%-27%), they are more than 10 points less likely to support doctor-assisted suicide compared to boomers(72%-81%-83%). As one reddit user aptly pointed out, “old age isn’t for sissies”.

However the largest gap existed over a particularly controversial topic- pornography. Over 30 points separated Millennials from Boomers on the issue, with the majority of Millennials deeming pornography morally acceptable (66% versus 32%). The rise of the internet and corresponding exponential increase in the accessibility of pornography may be having implications for younger generations’ conceptions of morality on this issue.

When compared to American Millennials, young Canadians appear more tolerant and progressive. We are notably more open to abortion, pornography, and doctor-assisted suicide. In contrast, American Millennials are more likely to see wearing animal fur and medical testing on animals as morally acceptable.

Perhaps the most interesting finding of this data is the degree of generational polarization in the US and Canada. In the US, the oldest and youngest generations often seem to hold wildly different belief systems. There are sometimes upwards of 20 points separating Millennials and Boomers on issues such as gay and lesbian relations, and sex and childbearing out of wedlock. On these same issues, young and old Canadians often diverge by only a point or two. One might speculate that this kind of generational polarization, or lack thereof, has serious ramifications for society. Social cohesion is difficult to build when the values held by its citizens are dependent on their age.

Overall, Canadians young and old should take comfort in the fact that despite some differences, we hold the same values on many fundamental issues.


Methodology

Our survey was conducted online with 1,500 Canadians aged 18 and over from June 14 to 16, 2016. A random sample of panelists was invited to complete the survey from a large representative panel of over 500,000 Canadians.

The Marketing Research and Intelligence Association policy limits statements about margins of sampling error for most online surveys.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of 1,500 is +/- 2.6%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

Abacus Data Inc.

We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and value added insight. Our team combines the experience of our Chairman Bruce Anderson, one of Canada’s leading research executives for two decades, with the energy, creativity and research expertise of CEO David Coletto, PhD.

HOW BIG ARE CANADIAN REGIONAL DIFFERENCES ON QUESTIONS OF MORALITY?

Our latest nationwide survey included questions on what people consider to be morally acceptable or morally wrong.

See our earlier releases  here and here.

Here’s a look at regional differences, particularly looking at how Alberta, often understood to be the most conservative province, and Quebec, often seen as at the other end of the spectrum. Here’s what we find:

Albertans and Quebecers largely agree (within five points of each other) on the morality of:

• Birth control, divorce, unmarried sex
• Recreational marijuana use
• Doctor assisted dying, and suicide
• Medical testing on animals, fur clothing
• Cloning animals and humans

Albertans are more likely than Quebecers to say the following are morally acceptable:

• Gambling (78% vs 67%)
• Pornography (50% vs 43%)
• Death penalty (63% vs 51%)

Quebecers are more likely than Albertans to say the following are morally acceptable:

• Abortion (80% vs 68%)
• Having children out of wedlock (93% vs 83%)
• Gay and lesbian relations (87% vs 79%)
• Married men and women having an affair (31% vs 10%)

Slide5 Slide6

THE UPSHOT

Bruce Anderson: notably, Quebecers and Albertans are more similar than different on many of these items, and neither region is that far afield of the views of the rest of the country. Still, Quebecers do seem more libertarian/secular/progressive on abortion, and sexual orientation on behaviour. Albertans are more likely to find gambling, pornography and the death penalty morally acceptable.

Methodology

Our survey was conducted online with 1,500 Canadians aged 18 and over from June 14 to 16, 2016. A random sample of panelists was invited to complete the survey from a large representative panel of over 500,000 Canadians.

The Marketing Research and Intelligence Association policy limits statements about margins of sampling error for most online surveys.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of 1,500 is +/- 2.6%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

Abacus Data Inc.

We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and value added insight. Our team combines the experience of our Chairman Bruce Anderson, one of Canada’s leading research executives for two decades, with the energy, creativity and research expertise of CEO David Coletto, PhD.

COMPARING CANADIAN MEN & WOMEN ON QUESTIONS OF MORALITY

Our latest nationwide survey included questions on what people consider to be morally acceptable or morally wrong. See our earlier release here.

Here’s a look at gender differences:

Women and men largely agree (within five points of each other) on the morality of:

• Abortion, birth control, divorce, unmarried sex, babies out of wedlock
• Gambling and recreational marijuana use
• Doctor assisted dying, and suicide

Where difference are more profound between the genders:

Women are more likely than men to say that gay and lesbian relations (84% vs. 77%) are morally acceptable.

Men are more likely than women to say each of the following is morally acceptable:

• Married men and women having an affair (23%-9%)
• Pornography (62%-37%)
• Clothing made of fur (54%-35%)
• Medical testing on animals (51%-28%)
• Cloning animals (38%-20%)
• Cloning humans (18%-11%)


Slide1 Slide2

THE UPSHOT

Bruce Anderson: There’s a lot that men and women agree about when it comes to defining morality, including some of the issues that otherwise could create important public policy cleavage: abortion, gambling, marijuana legalization, and medically assisted death.

The gap on same sex marriage is modest; in fact women and men are more prone to disagree on matters of pornography and adultery, than about homosexuality. Women are clearly more likely to be leading the pressure on animal rights issues, in Canadian society.

Methodology

Our survey was conducted online with 1,500 Canadians aged 18 and over from June 14 to 16, 2016. A random sample of panelists was invited to complete the survey from a large representative panel of over 500,000 Canadians.

The Marketing Research and Intelligence Association policy limits statements about margins of sampling error for most online surveys.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of 1,500 is +/- 2.6%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

Abacus Data Inc.

We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and value added insight. Our team combines the experience of our Chairman Bruce Anderson, one of Canada’s leading research executives for two decades, with the energy, creativity and research expertise of CEO David Coletto, PhD.