Liberal support recovers slightly

After several weeks of downward pressure caused by the WE Charity matter, Liberal support is showing some signs of recovery.

An election today would see the Liberals (36%) with a 6-point margin over the Conservatives (30%) and the NDP further back with 18%.

The regional patterns show the Liberals ahead of the BQ by 8 in Quebec, ahead of the Conservatives by 15 in Ontario, ahead of the Conservatives by 7 in BC, and leading by 16 in Atlantic Canada, with the NDP and Conservatives trailing. The Conservatives widened their advantage over the Liberals in Alberta and Saskatchewan. The Liberals could win re-election based on these numbers.

Impressions of Prime Minister Trudeau also improved from our last measurement, by 4-points. As he prepares to leave the leadership of the Conservatives, impressions of Andrew Scheer remain decidedly more negative (47%) than positive (21%). Views of NDP leader Jagmeet Singh are stable at 35% positive and 26% negative.

Approval of the federal government had been declining for three straight measurement periods. Still, that decline has stopped in this survey, with 45% saying they approve of the job Ottawa is doing and 38% disapproving. A year ago, in the wake of the SNC scandal, those numbers were the reverse, with 36% approval and 45% disapproval.

The accessible voter pool for the Liberals has not been materially affected by the WE matter, with 53% saying they would consider voting Liberal, compared to 46% for the NDP and 44% for the Conservatives.

The Liberal Party has an 11-point advantage in accessible voter pool compared to the Conservatives in BC, a 20 point advantage in Ontario, a 27-point advantage in Atlantic Canada. In Quebec, the Liberals have an 11-point advantage over the Conservatives and the NDP, and a 7-point advantage over the BQ.

For the Conservatives, their accessible voter pools are massive advantages in the Prairies. Only 32% of Quebecers would consider voting Conservative.

The NDP finds more extensive accessible voter polls in BC, Atlantic Canada, and Ontario, where about half of people in those regions open to voting for the party. Only 1 in 3 Quebecers are open to voting NDP. More importantly, while the voter pools for the Conservatives and Liberals are relatively consistent across age groups, the younger Canadians are much more open to voting NDP than older Canadians. Only 30% of those aged 60+ would consider voting NDP, half as many as those aged 18 to 29.

UPSHOT

According to Bruce Anderson: “Canadians generally seem to have returned their focus to everyday life, enjoying what’s left of the summer, managing life during COVID, the return to school, the future of the economy, the election in the US. The Conservatives have an opportunity to re-set their party with a change of leaders in the next week, but so far, many Canadians are not looking for a fundamental change in direction. Anxiety is high about many things, but skirmishing in Ottawa is not at the top of that list of things for many people, it seems.”

According to David Coletto: “The bleeding from the WE controversy seems to have stopped, and Liberal support has rebounded, giving the incumbents a healthy lead over the Conservatives. The Prime Minister’s image has improved over the past few weeks.

As the Conservatives select their new leader this week, the party finds itself in one of its weaker positions over the past decade. It continues to have a smaller accessible voter pool than either the Liberal or New Democratic parties. Andrew Scheer remains the most unpopular national party leader. Whoever becomes Conservative leader will have a lot of work to expand the party’s appeal. Despite all the challenges the Liberals have faced over the past few months, the party’s support is stuck in the low 30s.”

ABOUT ABACUS DATA

We are the only research and strategy firm that helps organizations respond to the disruptive risks and opportunities in a world where demographics and technology are changing more quickly than ever.

Find out more about what we are doing to help clients respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

We are an innovative, fast-growing public opinion and marketing research consultancy. We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and exceptional value.

We were one of the most accurate pollsters conducting research during the 2019 Canadian Election.

Contact us with any questions.

Find out more about how we can help your organization by downloading our corporate profile and service offering.

METHODOLOGY

The survey was conducted with 1,500 Canadian residents from August 14 to 19, 2020. A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.6%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

Join our team as Director, Public Sector Research

Location: Ottawa, Ontario

Compensation:

  • Competitive compensation package commensurate with experience.
  • Annual performance bonus 20-30% of base salary.
  • Generous marketing bonus for all new business development.

Expected start date: September or October 2020

The opportunity: Here at Abacus Data, a premier Canadian public opinion research & strategy agency, we are looking to capitalize on explosive growth by adding to our senior team.

If you are an experienced, energetic, self-starting research and public affairs professional who lives & breathes public affairs and knows government well, let’s talk.

In this role, you will work closely with the firm’s executive team to help grow the firm’s public sector practice.

As a senior member of our growing and evolving team, you will directly influence our future growth and success by acting as the lead in building a practice focused on public sector social and market research.

You will be responsible for helping to grow our public sector-focused research practice by working closely with the Director of Business Development and CEO to identify opportunities, build relationships with potential clients, and manage client relationships and projects with the research team.

In this role, you will work directly with clients, often acting as the lead contact with our growing public sector client group.  In addition, you will be a leader and mentor to our research team.  Finally, you will regularly interact with other service lines to bring the best Abacus Data solutions to our clients.

You will be expected to identify new business opportunities, coordinate with the sales and marketing team, and execute new projects as they are converted.

Responsibilities:

  • Develop a strategy to expand the public sector client base and strengthening our offering to public sector clients at all levels (federal, provincial, and municipal).
  • Report directly to the CEO (David Coletto) and work closely with the Executive Director and Director of Business Development as a member of the firm’s executive team.
  • Drive our team to deliver high-quality work for our clients that is error-free, valuable, and meets the standards of our leadership team.
  • Manage day to day responsibilities of research projects, start to finish including client consultation, proposal development, oversight of the creation of research instruments, analysis, and presentation of final deliverables.

Requirements:

  • 4 to 8 years of experience in a client servicing role in public affairs, research, or the public sector with experience designing, executing, and analyzing public opinion research projects.
  • Experience analyzing data and helping leaders use data to make decisions.
  • An analytical mind that is excited about telling stories using data and research.
  • Experience managing a team.
  • Clear evidence of being detail-oriented with a focus on delivery and error-free work.
  • Able to create stunning presentations that tell the story in our data to our clients and potential clients.
  • Strong interpersonal, writing, organizational, problem solving, and communication skills
  • Ability to work with minimal supervision and execute a strategy.
  • University or college degree/diploma in a related field.
  • Bilingual in English and French is not a requirement, but an asset.

Desired Skills and Experience:

  • Driven to succeed – self-starter, with a record of getting things done.
  • Detail-oriented – you are someone who is picky, relenting, and focused on delivering error-free, high-quality work.
  • Innovative – you think of interesting and alternative ways to improve the quality of the work we output.
  • Collaborative – you can work closely with the team to leverage expertise to improve the quality of the work we do.
  • Persistent – doing whatever it takes to get things done with integrity and without excuses.
  • Independent – you work well without constant supervision and cherish your freedom to achieve business and personal objectives.

Apply by August 21 at 5pm ET

If you think you’re the right candidate for this task, please send a cover letter and CV to David Coletto at david@abacusdata.ca.  Only those selected for the next round of the process will be contacted.

About Abacus Data Inc.

Founded in 2010, Abacus Data is an innovative, fast-growing public opinion and marketing research consultancy. We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and exceptional value.

We have offices in Ottawa and Toronto but work with clients across North America such as Shaw Communications, the Canadian Bankers Association, the Mining Association of Canada, Food & Consumer Products of Canada, NAV Canada, the Wine Growers of Canada, Teck, Imperial Oil, Canadian Real Estate Association, Google, the Air Canada Pilots Association, NUPGE, HealthPartners, the Paramedic Association of Canada, the Canadian Pharmacists Association, and Music Canada.

Our vision is to be Canada’s premier data-based strategy firm with a reputation for outstanding customer service, creative thinking, and innovative methods.  We will do that by working harder, being more creative, delivering more value to our clients, while doing it all with a smile.

For more information about Abacus Data, visit our website at www.abacusdata.ca

As the pandemic goes on, the threat to live music grows

For video interviews by Skype or Zoom or audio interviews, please contact David at 613-884-4730 or david@abacusdata.ca

In May, we published results of a national survey conducted for Music Canada to explore how the music industry is being impacted by the pandemic through the lens of concert-goers and those who consume live, in-person music. That study found widespread hesitation about returning to live music, given the safety concerns many Canadians were feeling, including those who regularly attend live music events. A few weeks ago, we also published results of a survey of Canadian musicians, exploring the impact of the pandemic through their eyes.

To assess whether perceptions and intentions have changed since that time, Music Canada commissioned us to conduct another national survey in which many of the same questions were re-asked.

Our survey finds that an increasing number of Canadians are concerned about COVID-19, and a growing number of them plan to avoid public events even after restrictions are lifted, resulting in a longer threat to live music.

Most Canadians, including those who regularly attend live music events, remain uncomfortable with returning to live music events in the foreseeable future. Concern about the virus is down but remains elevated. More today think the worst is yet to come than did back in April.

The results also suggest that several safety measures may do little to alleviate fears of infection. Even if live events are allowed to re-open, most consumers will likely stay home, including those who tell us they deeply miss the experience of attending live, in-person music events.

Many Canadians have experienced cancelled or postponed concerts, and among those who have seen those events cancelled, there is a deep sense of loss and frustration. Despite this, music remains a source of comfort and discovery for Canadians during this pandemic.

This second round of research is also a reminder of the importance of live music to Canadians. They continue to report that they value music; they miss going to live music events; and they miss it more than they did in April. While they are discovering new artists and finding more new content from their favourite artists, the vast majority of Canadians agree that digital performances will never replace the feeling of attending live music events.

Here are some additional highlights from the research:

CONCERNS ABOUT COVID-19 REMAIN ELEVATED.

One in three Canadians are extremely worried or worried a lot about COVID-19 today, down slightly from April but still elevated. Concerns cross all age groups and are fairly consistent across the country.

More troubling, more Canadians today believe the worst is still to come with the pandemic than they did in April (44% today vs. 39% in April). These views are even higher among those who regularly attend live music events (those we refer to as Live Music Lovers), with almost half thinking the worst is still to come.

The widespread concern about the pandemic means that few Canadians (18%) want health authorities and governments to move more quickly to allow normal activities to resume. Four in ten want governments to move more slowly than they currently are.

MORE CANADIANS MISS GOING TO CONCERTS THAN IN APRIL AND WHILE THE AVAILABILITY OF DIGITAL CONTENT IS APPRECIATED IT DOESN’T REPLACE THE FEELING OF SEEING LIVE MUSIC.

Millions of Canadians have experienced postponed or cancelled live events over the past few months due to the pandemic, including half of those who regularly go to live music events.

Many Canadians want to get back to enjoying live music when it’s safe to do so. Since April, those who say they really miss going to concerts has increased by 11 percentage points to 88%. Another 77% are upset about cancelled music festivals this summer.

And despite many digital alternatives being available, most say that digital content won’t replace the feeling of seeing live music, including 89% who attend live music events regularly.

That being said, music remains a vital antidote to the stress and anxiety caused by the pandemic. Eight in ten Canadians agree that listening to music is a way to relieve stress. More than half agree they have found new content online about music and musicians they love, and 4 in 10 have discovered new artists during the pandemic.

This is especially true of Live Music Lovers. Almost all of them say they miss live music events and concerts and agree that digital experiences won’t replace the feeling of seeing a concert in person. They want to experience live music again and can’t wait until they feel comfortable to do so.

AS ECONOMIES RE-OPEN, MORE CANADIANS EXPECT TO STAY AWAY FROM LIVE MUSIC EVENTS LONG AFTER PHYSICAL DISTANCING RESTRICTIONS ARE LIFTED.

Among all Canadians, large majorities express hesitation returning to live music events. More than seven in ten say it will take at least six months or more before they feel comfortable going to large or small indoor concerts or music festivals.

Even most of those who regularly attend live events report say it will take a long time before they are comfortable returning. 55% say they will wait at least six months or longer to attend a music festival after physical restrictions end – and for large concert venues, it is 60%. Perceptions of risk for attending these types of events are rising over time instead of declining. Ultimately, Canadians are more resistant to returning to live music events today than they were three months ago.

SAFETY PROCEDURES AT VENUES WILL DO LITTLE TO REDUCE PERCEPTIONS OF RISK ASSOCIATED WITH RETURNING TO LIVE MUSIC EVENTS.

While Canadians miss attending live music events, many suggested safety protocols or procedures do little to make them feel more comfortable returning to live events.

When we tell respondents that a venue has reduced the number of attendees that can go to a concert, only 15% of all Canadians and 32% of Live Music Lovers say they are certain to or likely to attend a concert.

Moreover, other safety measures such as mandatory mask-wearing and hand sanitization or physically distanced seating only get 19% to 24% of people saying they would be more likely to attend an indoor concert. Even those most likely to attend live events remain resistant, even with these measures in place.

All this suggests that even if venues put in place procedures that reduce the risk of infection, concert-goers will continue to be hesitant to return, and potentially for a number of months. Just because people can attend a concert with these new measures, it doesn’t mean they will.

UPSHOT

The COVID-19 pandemic continues to elicit widespread worry and anxiety for millions of Canadians. The threat of the virus has not subsided, and if anything, the longer the pandemic lasts, the more people recognize that the disruption to their lives will last far longer than many expected when the pandemic started.

Our survey for Music Canada clearly demonstrates that even if concerts are allowed to re-open, audiences will be slow to return, even among those who regularly attend these kinds of events and genuinely miss them during this extended pandemic.

Safety measures will make some people more comfortable and reduce the potential risk of infection, but the data suggests it may not be enough to make these events viable. Not only will most measures – like mask-wearing, distancing, and hand sanitizing – not be enough to bring back most back, but they could have a negative impact on the overall experience. These measures are likely to repel as many concert-goers as they attract back.

All in all, these results paint a bleak picture for the artists, technicians, and others who depend on live music to make a living. While Canadians value their craft and miss the live music experience more as the pandemic continues, their elevated concerns about the virus make them more hesitant to return to live events. Even when live music events return, fans may not at the level needed for venues and live events to be economically viable. Until the risk of infection drops substantially, the threat to live, in-person music remains real and profound.

METHODOLOGY

Our survey was conducted online with 2,000 Canadians aged 18 and over from July 13 to 17, 2020. A random sample of panellists was invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. These partners are double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.2%, 19 times out of 20. The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

ABOUT MUSIC CANADA

Music Canada is a non-profit trade organization founded in 1964 that promotes the interests of its members as well as their partners, the artists.

Our members are:

ABOUT ABACUS DATA

We are the only research and strategy firm that helps organizations respond to the disruptive risks and opportunities in a world where demographics and technology are changing more quickly than ever.

Find out more about what we are doing to help clients respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

We are an innovative, fast-growing public opinion and marketing research consultancy. We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and exceptional value.

We were one of the most accurate pollsters conducting research during the 2019 Canadian Election.

Contact us with any questions.

Find out more about how we can help your organization by downloading our corporate profile and service offering.

WE Controversy undermines Liberal support and confidence in Morneau & Trudeau

The controversy about the WE Charity has eroded Liberal support, including among one in five who voted for a Liberal candidate only months ago.

An election today would see the Liberals (34%) with a 4-point margin over the Conservatives (30%) and the NDP further back with 17%. The regional patterns in the most populous provinces show the BQ and Liberals statistically tied (33% to 32%) in Quebec, a tie between the Liberals and Conservatives in Ontario (36% to 35%), and a 12-point Liberal lead in BC. In Atlantic Canada, the Liberals lead by 19-points. The Liberals could win re-election based on these numbers but their lead has been significantly diminished in a short period of time.

Other indicators confirm that the We Charity matter is creating scar tissue for the incumbents.

Approval of the government is down 4-points in 10 days, and 14-points since May. Negative opinion about Mr. Trudeau is up 5-points over the same period, and up 11-points since May. For the first time in months, more people have a negative view of the Prime Minister than a positive one.

Across the country, 44% would like to see a new Liberal leader before the next election, while 30% would prefer to see Mr. Trudeau continue, and 26% aren’t sure at this point. Among those who voted Liberal last November, 65% would like to Mr. Trudeau lead the party in the next election, while 17% would prefer someone else, and 18% are unsure.

THE WE CHARITY CONTROVERSY

Just about half of those surveyed (48%) say they have been following the WE matter very or pretty closely, largely unchanged from our last survey earlier this month. Overall awareness of the issue has increased though with only 14% reporting being unaware of it at all (down 5 points since July 16).

Of those aware of the WE issue, 14% believe the government has handled this situation well, 31% say it’s been handled “ok” and 55% say the government has done a poor job. More than one in three Liberal 2019 voters feel the government has handled this poorly.

A majority (57%) say it seems to them an “attempt to use public money to reward people who are friends and supporters) while 43% say it is more “about short time frames and a lack of proper diligence on the part of the government”. These numbers have shifted 4-points towards the patronage conclusion in the last ten days.

Among those who voted Liberal last fall, 34% think the WE matter is about helping reward friends and supporters with public money, up 3-points since July 16.

SHOULD MINISTER MORNEAU RESIGN?

Half (48%) don’t feel they know enough about Bill Morneau’s role in the matter to have an opinion. Among those who do have an opinion, more think he should resign (35%) rather than stay on (16%) as Finance Minister. Among those who voted Liberal in October, one in five (21%) feel Mr. Morneau should step down, 34% say he should not, and the rest aren’t sure.

Among those who have been following the WE matter closely, 54% say the Finance Minister should step down compared to 26% who say he should stay on, and 20% who don’t have an opinion at this point.

UPSHOT

According to Bruce Anderson: “COVID dominates public concerns, but this matter has nonetheless left an unmistakable mark on public impressions of the Liberals. Lots of opinion is yet to be formed, and time will tell whether the matter fades to the background or becomes even more politically charged, but for the Liberals, there are clear warning signals in these numbers.

A lot of those who supported the party just months ago, seem tepid or even cooler than that in their feelings towards Mr. Morneau. That two-thirds of Liberal 2019 voters want Mr. Trudeau to lead the party next election is not the overwhelming vote of confidence he might have seen had we asked the same question a couple of months ago.

This signals that some voters will be watching carefully to see how he handles himself and manages his government in the days to come, including in his testimony at the Finance Committee. The issue now may now be less about recusal or whether there was corrupt intent, and more about effective management of government and how he responds to the inevitable issues and errors that can arise.”

According to David Coletto: “The WE Charity controversy has turned an eleven point Liberal lead to a four-point in a matter of months. The Liberals are tied with the Conservatives in Ontario and the BQ in Quebec. Worse, underlying attitudes towards the government and the Prime Minister continue to deteriorate. More people now have a negative view of the Prime Minister than a positive one and the government’s approval rating is back to where it was prior to the pandemic.

Canadians remained engaged on the issue and views are shifting away from the government’s narrative. The longer this is a story, the more it damages the public’s impression of the Prime Minister and the government. These results should be a wake-up call to Liberals. It also raises the stakes for the Conservative leadership race because it’s clear, the Liberals are beatable again.”

ABOUT ABACUS DATA

We are the only research and strategy firm that helps organizations respond to the disruptive risks and opportunities in a world where demographics and technology are changing more quickly than ever.

Find out more about what we are doing to help clients respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

We are an innovative, fast-growing public opinion and marketing research consultancy. We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and exceptional value.

We were one of the most accurate pollsters conducting research during the 2019 Canadian Election.

Contact us with any questions.

Find out more about how we can help your organization by downloading our corporate profile and service offering.

METHODOLOGY

The survey was conducted with 1,500 Canadian residents from July 27 to 29, 2020. A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.6%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

WE Controversy takes a bite out of Liberal support and the PM’s image too.

If an election were held right now, the Liberal Party (36%) lead nationally – five-point ahead of the Conservatives (31%) – but Liberal support has slid four points since our last measurement at the end of June.

The Liberals lead has shrunk to 7-points in Ontario, 4-points over the BQ in Quebec, and the Liberals are tied with the NDP in BC, with the Conservatives trailing in third.

Public impressions of the Prime Minister have also taken a hit, dropping 5-points over the past month. Today 42% have a positive view of Mr. Trudeau and 36% say their feeling is negative. On a regional basis, Mr. Trudeau is net +6 nationally (42% positive, 36% negative), +9 in BC, +9 in Ontario, +6 in Quebec and +14 in Atlantic Canada.

By a 14-point margin, more people approve of the federal government’s performance today than disapprove (48% approve, 34% disapprove), although approval is down 10-points over the past two months and 4-points since June. Approval remains above 50% in BC, Ontario and Atlantic Canada but has sagged below in Quebec and the Prairies. In Quebec, approval of the federal government is down 12-points, to 40%.

THE WE CHARITY CONTROVERSY

Across the country, 14% have been following the controversy over the federal government’s plan to engage the We Charity to operate a summer jobs program. Another 33% have been following it fairly closely.

Based on what they have heard about the We Charity matter to date, 18% say the federal government has managed the matter well, another 28% say “ok”, while a majority give the government poor (29%) or very poor (24%) marks.

Reactions are fairly negative across the country, and even 40% of those who voted Liberal last fall says the government handled this poorly.

When asked if they feel the controversy is about “short time frames and a lack of proper diligence on the part of the government” or “an attempt to use public funds to reward people who are friends and supporters” – opinion is pretty evenly split, with the slight majority (53%) suggesting it was about patronage rather than a lack of diligence.

Quebecers are 6-points more likely than those in Ontario or BC to think the controversy was about using public funds to help friends and supporters.

Again it is worth noting that 31% of those who voted Liberal say the WE Charity controversy was about trying to reward friends and supporters.

UPSHOT

According to Bruce Anderson: “The WE Charity controversy has damaged the government’s standing with Canadians, after several months of people feeling fairly positive towards the Prime Minister and the Liberals. So far the damage is significant but not extreme. For the Liberals, these results are a reminder that ethical lapses can bring about a swift reversal of political fortune, and can undermine confidence even among those who supported the party at the ballot box only months ago.”

According to David Coletto: “For the past several months, impressions of the Prime Minister and the Liberal Party been trending positively as a result of the public’s positive evaluation of the government’s handling of the pandemic. Canadians evaluated the Prime Minister’s leadership through the lens of the crisis.

But, over the past few weeks, that lens has shifted as a result of the WE Charity controversy. Despite it being summer, Canadians remained highly engaged with current affairs and more continue to follow the news than they might normally do. It’s pretty clear to me that the controversy has harmed the Prime Minister’s image and pulled the Liberal vote down with it.”

ABOUT ABACUS DATA

We are the only research and strategy firm that helps organizations respond to the disruptive risks and opportunities in a world where demographics and technology are changing more quickly than ever.

Find out more about what we are doing to help clients respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

We are an innovative, fast-growing public opinion and marketing research consultancy. We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and exceptional value.

We were one of the most accurate pollsters conducting research during the 2019 Canadian Election.

Contact us with any questions.

Find out more about how we can help your organization by downloading our corporate profile and service offering.

METHODOLOGY

The survey was conducted with 1,500 Canadian residents from July 13 to 16, 2020. A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.6%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

Crowded Out: What Canada’s professional musicians say the impact of the pandemic has been on their lives, art, and, work.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on the lives and incomes of Canada’s professional musicians. Not only have live events been cancelled or postponed this year, but the outlook for 2021 is not promising.

According to a national survey of over 700 professional musicians commissioned by Music Canada, most professional musicians say that the number of bookings so far for 2021 is lower than usual, and many don’t expect a quick return to the stage – either because of government restrictions or personal discomfort performing while the risk of the virus exists.

Most professional musicians in Canada have relied on government emergency aid to get by. But as those programs expire, the outlook for professional musicians is quite dire. Professional musicians are feeling anxious, scared, uncertain, and worried about the future.

1. Live music is the lifeblood for Canada’s professional musicians.

It is how they make their living and, more important to them; it is what motivates them as artists. The pandemic feels like a choice – between making a living and keeping them and their family safe. A choice that makes them very uncomfortable.

Canadian professional musicians perform, on average, 96 times a year, travelling across Canada and the globe to performance. The revenue they generate from live performances helps support, on average, another 11.5 other people like band members and those who go on tour with them.

2. The pandemic has had a severe impact on Canada’s professional musicians’ ability to earn a living.

85% agree that if they can’t perform live, they will have a difficult time making a living as a professional musician. To underscore the impact of the pandemic, for the rest of 2020, the average number of bookings is eight, down from last year’s average of 87. More than half of the musicians surveyed have zero performances booked for the remainder of the year.

3. Despite loving to perform, many worry about the health risks associated with COVID-19 if performances restart.

They worry about their safety, the safety of their loved ones who might be exposed to the virus they could contract, their fans and audiences, and the impact distancing restrictions will have on the experience performing. While some safety protocols, like limited audience size or temperature checks, make some feel more comfortable, there is no silver bullet. The risk of COVID-19 is still too high for most musicians.

4. The pandemic has also had an impact on professional musicians’ ability to create music.

Most professional musicians surveyed report that their ability to create music or songs been negatively impacted by the pandemic. The pandemic has isolated them from other artists. Physical distancing at home and not being able to access creative spaces is distracting and affects their creativity and productivity.

5. Going digital isn’t an easy solution for most professional musicians.

The technical aspects and isolation make performing difficult, and the income replacement is nowhere near enough to make up for in-person performances. Many musicians report steep learning curves with technology and dissatisfaction with the lack of connection a digital experience creates between them and their audiences.

6 As long as physical distancing requirements continue and live performances are limited, professional musicians in Canada will find it hard to make a living.

This will hurt their livelihoods, impact their families, and those who are supported by the revenue generated from their live performances (band members, managers, technicians, and others in the industry). It may also have a long-term impact on their creativity and music they produce.

Download the full the report

Download the full report

METHODOLOGY

On behalf of Music Canada, Abacus Data conducted a national survey of 723 Canadian professional musicians and a 90-minute online focus group with 12 professional musicians to explore the impact the COVID-19 pandemic was having on their careers, emotional and financial well-being, and the impressions of the music industry in Canada.

An exploratory focus group was conducted before the survey on May 28, while the survey was conducted from June 11 to 23, 2020.

Respondents were invited via the Connect platform and using snowball sampling from Music Canada’s Advisory Council.

The margin of error for the survey is + 3.7%, 19 times out of 20.

ABOUT MUSIC CANADA

Music Canada is a non-profit trade organization founded in 1964 that promotes the interests of its members as well as their partners, the artists.

Our members are:

ABOUT ABACUS DATA

We are the only research and strategy firm that helps organizations respond to the disruptive risks and opportunities in a world where demographics and technology are changing more quickly than ever.

Find out more about what we are doing to help clients respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

We are an innovative, fast-growing public opinion and marketing research consultancy. We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and exceptional value.

We were one of the most accurate pollsters conducting research during the 2019 Canadian Election.

Contact us with any questions.

Find out more about how we can help your organization by downloading our corporate profile and service offering.

Canadian do not want to speed up return to normal activities – America is a cautionary tale.

When asked to assess the speed at which different governments are moving to return to normal activities, most Canadians say the current pace is appropriate or things are going to fast. Few think the federal or provincial governments are moving too slowly. Most think the Trump Administration is moving too quickly.

Only 10% of respondents in our latest national survey think the federal government is moving too slowly to “return to more normal activities”, while three times as many people say the pace is too quick. The majority (61%) say things are going at about the right pace. In no province do more than 15% want things speeded up. The cautious instinct crosses party lines, with only 18% of Conservatives, 3% of Liberals, 13% of Bloc voters and 7% of New Democrats in favour of speeding up.

Responses are similar when people are asked about the pace of return to normal by their provincial government. Only 7% say the pace is too slow, compared to 29% who say too fast, and a majority (64%) say the pace is about right. In no part of the country do more than 11% want their provincial government to move more quickly and those in Alberta, SK/MB, and Ontario are more likely to want their governments to slow down the reopening.

These results contrast sharply with how Canadians see things going in the United States. Two in three (68%) Canadians think the Trump Administration is moving too quickly, while 15% say the right pace and 17% say America should move more quickly. The majority of supporters of all the political parties in Canada say the US should move more slowly.

Based no doubt in part on how they feel about the need for ongoing caution, and the perception that there is too little of that south of the border, Canadians are overwhelmingly of the view (89%) that the border should remain closed longer.

UPSHOT

COVID fatigue may be real, but there’s not much appetite in Canada for speeding up economic recovery if it means greater health risks.

Canadians are mostly content with the pace set by their governments, or a bit anxious as re-opening unfolds, and watching new infection records and deaths rising again in the US will likely only make people more tentative about how they approach a return to a more normal life.

ABOUT ABACUS DATA

We are the only research and strategy firm that helps organizations respond to the disruptive risks and opportunities in a world where demographics and technology are changing more quickly than ever.

Find out more about what we are doing to help clients respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

We are an innovative, fast-growing public opinion and marketing research consultancy. We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and exceptional value.

We were one of the most accurate pollsters conducting research during the 2019 Canadian Election.

Contact us with any questions.

Find out more about how we can help your organization by downloading our corporate profile and service offering.

METHODOLOGY

The survey was conducted with 1,500 Canadian residents from June 26 t0 30, 2020. A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.8%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

COVID-19: Almost as many feel mental health impacts as feel financial woes.

In our last national survey, we asked Canadians to what extent the pandemic has impacted different aspects of their lives.

Here’s what we found:

Almost as many Canadians report the pandemic has had a negative impact on their mental health as those who say it has had a negative impact on their financial well-being. 40% say the pandemic has had a negative impact on their finances compared with 37% who say the pandemic has negatively impacted their mental health.

31% report negative impacts on their physical fitness. In contrast, 53% report positive impacts on their appreciation of nature – birds, hiking, gardening, etc.

40% Canadians say that the Covid-19 pandemic has had a negative effect on their financial well-being, while 15% say there has been a positive effect and 45% say they do not see any real effect. Women are slightly more likely (+3) more likely than men to say their financial well being has been harmed. Financial harm is more prevalent west of Quebec and less common in Quebec and Atlantic Canada.

Those in households making less than $50,000 a year are 13-points more likely to report negative impacts on their financial well-being than those earning more than $100,000.


Almost as many (37%) say the pandemic has had a negative effect on their mental health, while 17% a positive impact Those under 45 are more likely than those over that age to cite mental health drawbacks. Quebecers are well under the national average in terms of citing mental health impacts, with 24% saying they feel a positive impact and 24% negative

Three out of ten (31%) say their physical fitness has suffered, while 23% say their fitness has improved. Among those under 30, as many say their fitness has improved as saying it has deteriorated. Among those 60 and older, people are two times more likely to say their fitness has deteriorated as improved.

On the positive side of things, 53% say living through the pandemic has had a positive effect on their appreciation of nature, while 4% say it has had the opposite effect. Women are 14-points more likely than men to feel this way, and those under 30 are considerably more likely to feel this way compared to those over 60.

UPSHOT

Millions of Canadians are feeling financial and mental health challenges from the Covid-19 pandemic. One in ten (9%) say the financial impact has been very negative, which equates to almost 3 million people. Almost as many (7%) report very negative mental health impacts and those under 30 are twice as likely to say this.

The impact on physical fitness is less pronounced, but still, on the whole, a negative impact. If there is a bright side, it’s that many people find themselves in a circumstance where they can appreciate nature more than before.

ABOUT ABACUS DATA

We are the only research and strategy firm that helps organizations respond to the disruptive risks and opportunities in a world where demographics and technology are changing more quickly than ever.

Find out more about what we are doing to help clients respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

We are an innovative, fast-growing public opinion and marketing research consultancy. We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and exceptional value.

We were one of the most accurate pollsters conducting research during the 2019 Canadian Election.

Contact us with any questions.

Find out more about how we can help your organization by downloading our corporate profile and service offering.

METHODOLOGY

The survey was conducted with 1,500 Canadian residents from June 26 t0 30, 2020. A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.8%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

1 in 4 Canadians never wear a mask but making it mandatory finds little resistance

Last week in a national survey of 1,500 Canadian adults we asked some questions about wearing masks as a way to prevent the spread of COVID-19.

Here’s what we found:

A third of Canadians always wear a mask when they enter a public place like a retail outlet and a quarter never do.

Men are significantly less likely to wear masks compared to women. Mask wearing is more common among the youngest and older adults, and resistance to wearing masks is highest among those in the 45-59 age group.

Mask wearing is most common in Ontario and least common in Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Atlantic Canada. 40% of rural-dwelling Canadians never wear a mask. Conservative voters are about 9 to 10 percentage points more likely than Liberals and New Democrats to say they never wear a mask.

Six in ten (60%) would prefer that mask-wearing “in an indoor area where there are other people, such as a retail store” should be mandatory, while 31% prefer that it be left up to individual choice. The preference for a mandatory approach is highest in Ontario (71%) while opinion is equally divided in Atlantic Canada and a majority in Saskatchewan and Manitoba prefer mask-wearing to be left up to the individual.

If governments decide to make mask-wearing mandatory, there would be little opposition, however. Only 14% would oppose such a move, while 62% would support it and another 24% would go along with it. Across party lines, only 24% of Conservatives, 9% of Liberals and 5% of New Democrats would be against such laws/regulations.

Regionally, a majority support making mask-wearing mandatory in all regions or provinces, except in Manitoba or Saskatchewan although more than 80% would support or go along with the policy if it was implemented. In the Greater Toronto Area, 71% support making mask-wearing mandatory.

UPSHOT

Mask wearing is common but far from universal in Canada. However, hesitation to use masks seems more a function of where one lives, social conditioning, and population density than a philosophical or political barrier.

While there is some variation along partisan lines, it would be an exaggeration to see these differences as implying a deep political culture divide – while 42% of Conservatives prefer a personal choice over a mandatory approach, actual opposition to mandated masks is only about a quarter of Conservatives.

ABOUT ABACUS DATA

We are the only research and strategy firm that helps organizations respond to the disruptive risks and opportunities in a world where demographics and technology are changing more quickly than ever.

Find out more about what we are doing to help clients respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

We are an innovative, fast-growing public opinion and marketing research consultancy. We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and exceptional value.

We were one of the most accurate pollsters conducting research during the 2019 Canadian Election.

Contact us with any questions.

Find out more about how we can help your organization by downloading our corporate profile and service offering.

METHODOLOGY

The survey was conducted with 1,500 Canadian residents from June 26 t0 30, 2020. A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.8%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

Most think Wexit is a terrible idea, but the concept could divide Conservatives.

In the wake of the announcement that former Harper-era cabinet minister Jay Hill is taking over the leadership of Wexit Canada – a political party whose goal is the separation of the four most western provinces from the rest of Canada – we polled Canadians on what they thought of this platform.

Here’s what we found:

• 12% think it’s a good idea for BC to separate, and another 26% could live with it, while 64% say it’s a terrible idea. In BC 13% say it’s a good idea, 16% could live with it, and 71% think it’s a terrible idea. Among federal Conservative voters, 16% say it’s a good idea, 22% could live with it, and 62% think it a terrible idea.

• 11% think it is a good idea for Alberta to separate, another 26% could live with it, while 63% say terrible. In Alberta, 20% like the idea, 26% could live with it, and 54% say it’s a terrible idea. Federal Conservative voters are 10-points more open to or supportive of the idea.

• 9% say it’s a good idea for Saskatchewan to leave the country, 29% could live with it, while 62% say it’s a terrible idea. 40% of federal Conservatives like (17%) or are open to (23%) the idea.

• Results about Manitoba separating are almost identical to those about Saskatchewan: 9% like the idea, 28% could live with it, and 62% say it’s a terrible idea.

• For all four provinces, Quebecers show a higher than average willingness to go along with separation, undoubtedly reflecting the fact that many people in Quebec have favoured Quebec separation at one point or another.

• 7% of Canadians think it would be a good thing if all four western provinces separated. Among that group, in 2019, 49% voted Conservative, 17% voted BQ, 16% voted Liberal, 11% voted NDP, and 5% voted for the People’s Party of Canada.

• 7% of those living across the four western-most provinces think it would be a good thing if all four western provinces separated. Among that group, in 2019, 81% voted Conservative.

UPSHOT

Western separation continues to find limited support but some potential acquiescence. Based on current sentiments there are enough advocates and enough strong opponents to imagine a spirited debate – but actual support for the concept is confined to a small minority.

Those willing to go along with the idea are not saying they would vote to support it, and the experience in most referendums is that an idea needs to start which considerably more than 50% support to finish above that level.

If there is a political consequence in the nearer term it may be the potential for this party, under Mr. Hill’s leadership, to drain support from the federal Conservative Party. Every vote he picks up hurts the Conservatives far more than any other party. The combination of a People’s Party, a Wexit campaign means the next federal Conservative leader will need to decide early whether to take a hard pro-Canada line against Mr. Hill’s effort or acknowledge the legitimacy of separatism in an effort to hold it’s base together.

ABOUT ABACUS DATA

We are the only research and strategy firm that helps organizations respond to the disruptive risks and opportunities in a world where demographics and technology are changing more quickly than ever.

Find out more about what we are doing to help clients respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

We are an innovative, fast-growing public opinion and marketing research consultancy. We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and exceptional value.

We were one of the most accurate pollsters conducting research during the 2019 Canadian Election.

Contact us with any questions.

Find out more about how we can help your organization by downloading our corporate profile and service offering.

METHODOLOGY

The survey was conducted with 1,500 Canadian residents from June 26 t0 30, 2020. A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.8%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.