CPC Leadership: MacKay leads. O’Leary has some appeal but a polarizing impact.March 30, 2016
By Bruce Anderson & David Coletto
Here are the highlights of our findings:
• Peter MacKay leads this field by 15 points, at 33% followed by Kevin O’Leary at 18%, Lisa Raitt at 12%, and Maxime Bernier at 10%. Tony Clement (9%), Jason Kenney (8%), Michael Chong (6%), and Kellie Leitch (3%) round out the field with less than 10% support.
• Among those who say they would vote Conservative today, Mr. MacKay’s lead over Mr. O’Leary shrinks to 9-points and Jason Kenney jumps to third place at 12%. All the other candidates are in single digits.
• Among voters who self describe as “right” on the political spectrum, MacKay (29%) and O’Leary (25%) are neck and neck with Bernier (10%) and Raitt (10%) cracking double digits.
• Among those who self-identify as “centre-right”, the results are MacKay 36%, O’Leary drops back to 15%, followed by Kenney 14% and Raitt and Clement at 9%.
• Among those who self-identify as “centre”, the results are MacKay 33%, O’Leary 20%, followed by Raitt at 12%, Bernier at 11% and Clement and Kenney at 8%.
We also asked whether the choice of any of these candidates would make people more or less likely to vote Conservative.
Here’s what we found:
• Among all respondents, only Peter MacKay had a net positive effect on Conservative support – that is more people said they would be more inclined to vote Conservative (20%) than those saying less inclined (13%). Kevin O’Leary had the second largest percentage of Canadians saying they would be more inclined to vote Conservative if he was leader (15%) but also the highest number saying they would be less inclined (23%).
• Among current Conservative supporters, all candidates except for Maxime Bernier, Michael Chong, and Kellie Leitch would have a net positive impact on support for the party. O’Leary is the most polarizing potential candidate – pulling 32% but pushing 18%.
We looked specifically at the potential impact Kevin O’Leary would have on likelihood to vote Conservative.
Overall, he has a net negative impact (that is more people say they would be less likely to vote Conservative than more likely to) with every demographic, political, and regional group except for past Conservative voters and Albertans.
Peter MacKay has strong name recognition and a considerable level of public support, although a number of other candidates would likely start with a critical mass of support, making for a competitive race.
The patterns show that within the Conservative Party there will be some drawn towards the candidate who has the most pronounced small c conservative views, while others will be attracted to a more moderate style of conservatism. These tensions will likely only start to play out once some candidates begin to declare an intention to run, and stake their claim to a place as “tent expanders” or “base rallyers”
If Kevin O’Leary decides to enter the fray, these results suggest he has the potential to be a somewhat polarizing force. Choosing Mr. O’Leary as leader would appeal to some of the most conservative party members, but would mean making the process of broadening the party’s appeal more difficult, not easier, at least initially.
Our survey was conducted online with 1,500 Canadians aged 18 and over from March 16 to 18, 2016. A random sample of panelists was invited to complete the survey from a large representative panel of over 500,000 Canadians.
The Marketing Research and Intelligence Association policy limits statements about margins of sampling error for most online surveys. The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.6%, 19 times out of 20. The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.
Abacus Data Inc.
We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail and value added insight. Our team combines the experience of our Chairman Bruce Anderson, one of Canada’s leading research executives for two decades, with the energy, creativity and research expertise of CEO David Coletto, PhD.